When people think about hurricanes, they think of them in context of bad weather. I, however, think of them as a thermodynamic phenomenon of cooling the ocean, which accumulated too much energy from the Sun and, in context of seasonal change, releases the excess via entropy into the atmosphere until thermodynamic equilibrium is established.
People also think of war in terms of bloodshed and conflict of nations and ideologies and interests, but the more I think of it, I think of war in terms of a sociological hurricane – a thermodynamic phenomenon of equalizing energy potential (wealth and control of resources) of different groups of people in a situation when current distribution of resources doesn’t match the balance of power between the groups.
Let’s test my hypothesis on the example of two world wars. I am yet to see the satisfactory explanation of the First World War. Nobody seems to be able to tell the root cause. They can tell you the unimportant stuff, they can tell you how the events themselves unfolded, but none of it explains why the great colonial powers felt such a strong itch to go into war, jumping on the first casus belli that presented itself as if war promised more than peace. None of it makes sense – the Austro-Hungarian empire, for instance, was seriously itching to go into war, for which it was the least well prepared of all great powers. Germany was better prepared, and it too itched to go into battle against Russia before it grew unstoppably powerful due to its ongoing industrialization, and yet the end result of the war was a near-destruction and humiliation of Germany. Austro-Hungary didn’t survive the war – it broke apart and its constituents started their independent lives as unstable, immature states, whose erratic behavior seems to have boiled over into the second world war, and the process doesn’t seem finished even now. What are we seeing here, since it doesn’t seem to be motivated by obvious self-interest? We have a war that transformed the society and yet none of the parties involved seems to have benefited from it; all seem to have been disrupted and brought out of balance as a result.
As an alternative explanation, I came up with modernity. You see, the most significant aspect of modernity is change of the entire energy-structure of society. Prior to the explosion of science and technology, the entire society was solar-powered, in a sense that you had land on which you could grow plants, and domesticated animals which fed on those plants, and the amount of resources available to the society was more-less constant and determined by the amount of people who worked on the available land with primitive agricultural technology. Those people were treated as a basic resource that came with the land, and were divided among the warrior class which used force to conquer and dominate. Political power was measurable through the amount of agricultural land populated by serfs, that a nobleman controlled. Each nobleman could directly control only as much land, and the pyramid of power was established, with lower-tier noblemen who directly controlled the serfs who in turn controlled the land, and higher-tier noblemen who had lower-tier noblemen as underlings. The higher-tier noblemen were subjects to a king, who in turn was subject to the highest entity of civilizational cohesion, for instance the Pope. As long as the basic energy source of the civilization remained constant, this was a stable system.
However, with the ascent of technology, industry and free market, the energy structure of society changed, and it became possible to acquire wealth by means other than top-down distribution of force-acquired solar-powered resources. Inventors, industrialists and bankers acquired wealth that rivaled and soon greatly surpassed that of feudal solar-powered structures; the social leverage, essentially wealth, that was created with the invention of the steam engine or the mass-production of high quality steel, or fractional distillation of petroleum, or electricity, or artificial fertilizers, changed the entire energy structure of the society, while the entire social system relied upon an obsolete hierarchy that was established in the pre-industrial age and was ill-suited to handle the needs and challenges of modernity. This is why the entire society boiled over in order to establish a new thermodynamic equilibrium, a political and economic structure that was better suited for the open-ended energy model. One example of that is the abandonment of the gold standard of currency and adoption of the fractional reserve fiat currency, which is able to create new money based on GDP in order not to artificially constrict the economy of the state. This is absolutely necessary when you have a situation where a Rockefeller or a Tesla can invent an entirely new open-ended energy model which creates an extreme amount of new wealth that is not covered by the gold reserves. Unless you want to artificially appreciate gold and thus give the owners of gold reserves an unfair and undeserved amount of wealth, you need to grow the monetary supply by the amount that at least equals the growth of the real economy, and in fact anticipates further growth. Furthermore, you need to acknowledge that nobility no longer controls significant enough portion of the economy to warrant their special status, and political control of the country must take the new balance of power into account.
I see the two world wars as hurricane 1 and hurricane 2 of the same season, where the second one continued where the first one failed to finish the process of achieving thermodynamic balance. Whenever a group of people controls too much resources for the amount of actual power their wield in the current state of affairs, there will be a violent conflict that will establish the real state of affairs. An example of this is the conflict between the Europeans and the native Americans, who controlled too much land for their state of technological and military power, and were therefore wiped out in order to establish a thermodynamic equilibrium.
The Second World War and its aftermath allowed modernity to run its course and try to fulfill its promise, and when it mostly failed, it resulted in profound soul-searching and often destructive self-criticism within the Western civilization, which is now trying to figure out its fundamental guiding principles and its reason for being; essentially, it is trying to figure out whether it has a mandate, and has for the most part relinquished its dominant role, with inferior savages such as Muslims trying to fill the vacuum created by the Euro-American civilization’s unwillingness to assert itself in ways it previously did. Establishing “life”, without any further elaboration, as the supreme value, is indicative of this abdication of mandate.
To me, all the elements of a social thermodynamic storm are ready to produce an outward phenomenon that will redistribute energy across the system according to the new realities that are yet to fully establish themselves.
If we are heading to total destruction, as wars in near future and ice age in far future, what has SK to gain from all of it? If he really created physical universe and its laws, why does he allow destruction of mankind? It sounds more logical if he keeps us relatively “safe” just to feed on us. If he kills us all, who the hell would be his next victims? Maybe new chain of evolution will start with new suckers tricked to incarnate here.
One of the most important things I figured out is that he’s not the only player here, nor is his power over this place unlimited. It has a pre-determined upper time limit, and the only part that Sanat Kumar plays in this is that this exact date is to remain unknown to humans. Jesus said that the exact time is known only to God; not even he was told. I certainly don’t know it, and I’m highly skeptical of anyone who says he does.
BTW, you are not important to Sanat Kumar. He doesn’t give a single fuck about humans. The only reason he does what he does is to prove God wrong, he’s actually trying to show that his concept of evolution is superior. I actually think he started as spiritually insane and this insanity transformed into evil. None of his motivations or emotions make any sense if you think of him as inherently sane. I got a very good sample of his thoughts and feelings and my personal opinion is that the biggest truth about him is that he’s an unworthy spiritual being that is envious, egomaniacal, spiteful, arrogant and, above all, absolutely convinced of his righteousness. He sees other spiritual beings as envious of his greatness and genius and wants to show how wrong they are about him and how right he was all the time, and is absolutely certain that in the end he will prevail and triumph. I completely understand why the Yazidi tradition calls him “The Peacock Angel”. That’s exactly what he feels like.
What do you mean by upper time limit? If he created physical universe how can he be on borrowed time here?
It’s like parking your car somewhere in the city and your parking ticket is good for 3 hours. After that you get a ticket and soon afterward you get your car towed. It doesn’t matter much that you own the car. Someone else owns the parking spot.
So its possible some kind of “intervention” that we talked about some time ago? If its not, who owns the parking spot?
Btw, one guy said that king of this world, i.e. SK was abolished around 2012. and another “king” took his place.
That was really weird to me when I heard it, but what if there are other contenders in this “game of thrones”, and all are evil sons of bitches?
Re: Who owns the parking spot, well, who owns the astral mahat-tattva?
Re: SK removed from power and another took his place, I don’t know who told you that but I’m impressed.
Yes, impressive theory but I can’t verify it yet. Does it matter really as whoever is in charge clearly hasn’t left us alone.
I don’t know who owns astral mahat tattva’s, I could theorize, but I don’t want to sound like a smart ass as I am only starting to get grip on reality.
Let’s just put it this way: Sanat Kumar is gone, but the mess he made will take some effort to clean up. It’s like Hiroshima, the bomb is gone but the aftermath, that’s something else.
So you really think he is gone, but it will be a looong time till the cleaning of mess?
“Yup”, and “I don’t know, but the workload is a bitch from hell with fangs”.
So in a sense Tolkien was right about the seeds of Morgoth. F great
This always confused me, who is evil from, is it ours here or SK influence/will, because you said before it was his and that he is the ”father of lies”. Now it’s more confusing, is it a permanent stain/mark or passing, on our souls?
I find your remark annoyingly arrogant. Mark? Stain? What if there’s a mark or a stain in you that is *not* of Satan?
I’ve been watching the apparently spiritually powerful beings degrade in the recent years, since the collapse of certain global structures created by Sanat Kumar, that are no longer available for them to use as a source of their spirituality.
And yet you seem to think that all he left in you is a “mark” or a “stain”.
No Danijel, I didn’t mean to be arrogant, I’ve just recently read how hard of time you’ve been really having and I’m just pissed and thought it would be instantly crystal clear once SK is gone. I hate this place so much and what’s your day like, I didn’t think of it and it’s strange that you have the will to write these powerful texts that are like a life line, food for some of us, we’re all waiting for the magic switch to happen.
And it was just confusing to me your saying “sins are really his”.
But in terms of the world I don’t understand how some still suck in *Welcome refugees<3* which seems to me that it is from SK, especially seeing the evils from that invasion. If SK is gone, that didn't change people.
Why would it change people? I don’t understand your logic. If Steve Jobs makes an iPhone and he dies, does iPhone suddenly cease to exist? If an evil being makes humans and dies, do they suddenly cease to be what they are?
To be very explicit about this, everything Satan created is a much greater problem than him, personally. In everything that is usually attributed to him, his hand is actually present in almost 0% of the cases. I think he only personally intervenes in the lives of seriously powerful “saints”, basically the incarnations of Gods, because his tools, “scripts”, basically structures for handling events, are quite sufficient for dealing with anything ordinary, and once he deals with an exception he makes a script that handles future occurrences.
As far as normal people such as yourself are concerned, Satan could have died 1000 years ago and you would never have noticed, all the scripts and structures that implement his will and plan would still be in place and would function as he intended them to, and they would feed of your investment of energy into the system, because he designed the system to be self-propagating without any investment of energy on his part. He did nothing with his own energy because that would be self-defeating. He simply deceives you, and then you form desire, this invests energy, he feeds that energy into the system to bind you and create future attractions, you reinvest in order to protect prior investment of energy, and basically you react like a gambler who loses everything in the end. Buddha is the only one who had the right idea about getting yourself out, his eightfold path works. However, the eightfold path is not the whole story. Jesus had an even better idea, almost as elegant but more effective, because he understood something that Buddha missed. Buddha overestimated the role of human volition in their own entrapment and underestimated the power and authority implicit in Mara’s ownership of this place. Jesus apparently attempted to completely negate Mara’s power, but what he actually managed to do is to create an exception to its universality by allowing himself to be sinned against by the Prince of this world. The teaching of Jesus also contains the most important aspects of the eightfold path: Do not strike back. Do not defend your life. Do not expect return of your investments. Let go of this world.
I don’t understand the part about Jesus. By dying did he manage to do something to SK or SK just tricked him to die?
I’m not sure what exactly Jesus tried to do, or what Satan exactly tried to do. I can only guesstimate based on my personal experience and knowledge of the outcomes. I know that he didn’t remove Satan from the position of power on this world, and he certainly didn’t kill him. He did, however, seem to have bought the “get out of jail free” ticket for those who choose to claim his and not Satan’s authority over them.
How did that work?
Well, Jesus had the right idea. He allowed Satan to sin against him and thus doom himself. Theoretically, if Satan used deadly force against someone who is pure and innocent and who actually embodies God in this world, it would be his death sentence (because the initial claim that he made, and through which he managed to evade punishment for his crimes, was that the purpose of this place was to allow the souls to evolve into true and superior form of knowledge, and directly fighting an embodiment of truth, knowledge and everything that God is, is a direct violation of this stated principle). That’s actually how he died, much later.
How Satan managed to survive his attack on Jesus is by claiming that this is in accordance with his original concept of providing souls with choices in order to allow them to evolve. So in order for there to be a choice there must not be certainty. Jesus must die but be allowed to resurrect. As a necessary condition of faith there must be uncertainty, but those who choose to believe will be allowed to walk free. Essentially, in order to survive his maneuver Satan needed to poke a significant hole in his trap, and I’m sure he didn’t like it, judging by the amount of trickery he created later in order to divert souls from actually using it.
That is my theory. How accurate it is, I don’t know. Judging by the mandate of heaven that Christianity seems to have, I’d say it’s pretty accurate.
Is there a reason to believe old Jesus will come again at the end of the world prophecy?
Btw, did he really resurrect himself (fully physical and healthy) three days after his death on cross or was that a some kind of etheric body?
I believe he really did resurrect a fully physical body, but one that was sufficiently different from his former physical appearance as to confuse the disciples, something like Gandalf the White vs. Gandalf the Gray.
As for him coming again, I think this part has not been interpreted well.
But why did the women recognize him immediately when he showed himself first?
Btw, there is a nice sentence in one of the gospels that says something like “Jesus came in through a closed door”. Because of that I find the nature of his resurrected body very interesting.
Well, she *was* his wife and “the disciple he loved above all others” so I guess there were some advantages of being her. 🙂
Recently I saw this interesting NDE prophecy video from a kid in Israel which resonated truthfully: https://youtu.be/ijB_aaBChTU
The kid speaks about how the Mashiat is alive and how everyone will be so surprised 🙂
Then I read how you used “black vajra whips” to defeat evil -while I can’t imagine what is that except something like a nuclear arsenal, I got the feeling the tide has finally turned. 🙂 But those words, black vajra, sounds like something most powerful, most heavy.
Yes, black vajra sounds like something way above your pay grade and you irritate me by attempting to talk stupid bullshit about it without even properly remembering the context in which the term was used.
Yes, I shouldn’t have said that, but it interested me so I slipped it in, seemed connected to the video I posted.
Who killed SK at the end, or is he was just cast aside, imprisoned? Can those beings really die, aren’t they supposed to be immortal?
The fact that Sanat Kumar managed to evade punishment so long isn’t due to his invulnerability, it’s due to immense difficulty of proving his sins, because he always presented things as if in the end it will be shown that the ultimate purpose of all this is the greater glory of God and true evolution of souls. Since he’s insane, it’s difficult to tell if he actually means it. It’s not “who” killed him, but “what”. His sins caught up with him. In a single moment, they got him to reveal his true intentions while attempting to murder one of the incarnate Gods with clear intention of murder, gloating over it, and not a single thought of “evolution” or other bullshit he invented to evade punishment; in his hatred of that particular God, he forgot that he had to play the game of “temptation”, and he was supposed to pretend to rejoyce the fact that this one stayed true up until the moment of his death, and instead he felt fierce joy of victory because he managed to kill him (death seemed inevitable and imminent). At this moment, the Gods arranged for his entire karmic load to be manifested at once and his consciousness was destroyed. He continued to exist for a few more years in form of remnants without consciousness, like an evil corpse that needed to be dissolved in a careful manner. His death made it possible to gradually attempt dismantling this nightmare of a trap that he created, which couldn’t be done were he alive and aware; he would oppose such attempts intelligently and it wouldn’t be possible.
What do you think, when really will all his manipulation structures be dismantled, is it even possible to predict such an event?
Longer I think about it, it seems to me that human race will not be able to experience such a free state, as we will be extinct, but maybe I am just being pessimistic.
You’re not pessimistic.
As for “how long”, stand in line because I’d like to know that, too. 🙂
Gods are mortal. They don’t decay with time and they can’t be killed by force of any kind, but they can be destroyed if they make choices that contradict the basic principles that hold their soul-structure together. The Christians would now drone on about mortal sins and so on, but they don’t understand how that works. God is not some powerful person, and God’s will is not an opinion or a choice, it’s the basic law of existence, the core morality according to which sat-cit-ananda is the fundamental criterion of worth. Attacking a great embodiment of sat-cit-ananda because you hate him and want him dead, with full knowledge of his greatness, is a mortal sin, in a sense that it destroys the basic cohesion of your soul and it loses structure; essentially, you as a soul fall apart, and this process of falling apart and decomposing into basic disorganized spiritual substance is the closest approximation of death you can possibly have, and unlike the physical one, where you merely lose a limiting outer envelope, this one is the true death.
So basically, muslims are going to fuck us good, and there’s no stopping them. Great. ;(
Unless someone pulls the plug before shit hits the fan, that is.
They will fuck us if we don’t find a reason why our lives are worth more than theirs. If we do, we can kill them all as easy as we kill cows on industrial farms. They are literally helpless against us, the power differential is so great. The only reason why they have a chance is that we don’t see why our lives are more important than someone else’s.
What’s really bothering me, why in hell are the leftist trying so bad to destroy everything the western civilization accomplished? The lack of faith? The hatred towards God?
That’s the post-modernistic self-skepticism I’m talking about. Basically, if everything is shit, it doesn’t matter if the Muslims win. Furthermore, since they hate themselves, they think that everyone is better than they are and they deserve to be destroyed as punishment for some imaginary failings.