A few days ago it was revealed that Gonzalo Lira, a pretty famous youtuber who stayed behind in Kharkov and openly criticised the Kiev regime and its Washington sponsors, died from torture in Ukrainian prison.
I didn’t want to react immediately because I wanted to think things through. My first impulse was sadness because someone I knew pretty well was killed in a horrible manner. My second impulse was anger at the perpetrators and their American handlers, and a wish for them to be punished for their evil. Then I thought about his role in this, because a reasonable person would first get out, and then criticise them, because the point of his criticism was that the Kiev regime is incredibly corrupt and evil, and is known for killing its critics, so him staying behind implies that he either believes his criticism of Kiev to be wrong, or he for some reason thinks he will be exempt from retribution, probably because of some invisible shield of human rights that all Americans believe they have. It is also possible that he had a mid-life crisis of some kind and wanted to be a hero, but since he didn’t look suicidal, he probably just assumed he’ll be fine because reasons.
What we did find out is that the person that said that pen is mightier than the sword didn’t know what he was talking about.
I think this video might explain significant part of his motivation.
https://youtu.be/qOP_w9RBeRA
I think he knew full well the danger since he had previously been imprisoned and allegedly tortured by the Kiev regime. I think he attempted to do the work of a journalist and payed the highest price. Do you have to have a midlife crisis to be heroic I don’t know. Either he had balls of steel or he was crazy or maybe a bit of both.
I am certain there is a lesson to be learned here. For instance, if you have evidence that government is villainous, it might be a good idea to assume the evidence is true before you publish it, and instead act upon it. This means that you would be well advised to assume that the first thing the government will do is disappear you. I think the Americans are particularly poorly suited for surviving such a situation, because they are used to thinking that they can criticise whatever and there will be no consequences. Well, try that out by criticising homosexuality in today’s America, see how long you stay employed. We who were brought up in communist countries instinctively know what we can’t say in public because “we’ll end up in Goli Otok” (a Yugoslav gulag). For instance, if you criticised Comrade Tito or “brotherhood and unity of our nations and nationalities”, your story came to a bad ending. You could also not criticise “socialist self-governing”, and if you complained about some corrupt official, he’d say you’re persecuting him because he’s a Serb and you also wound up in prison. It’s basically what we have today, only the protected categories have changed. The problem the Americans are having is that they suck at recognising the signs that they are in a totalitarian country; we who grew up in totalitarian countries have a “nose” for it, and we know what you have to do.
Do people even contemplate their existence? If yes, do they believe they can be the measure of their own behavior? If they don’t think they can be the measure of their own behavior, where do they place and how do they reach an external point that is supposed to serve as a potential measure of behavior?
This is the way the Devil labels his governance over the world as self-regulation, even declaring that as the freedom of choice that human vehicles consume in this perverse prison?
So, other people caused the death of the individual, not the Devil’s model of world regulation?
Let’s set aside this world for a moment in relation to those individuals who are truly evil. The problem lies with those other individuals who are good, but their lives in this world create confusion with the aim of breaking them.
I’m afraid it would not be realistic to blame Satan for everything here, because there is a very significant percentage of humans who would give him a run for his money.
Yes, I absolutely agree with you. Moreover, it wouldn’t be good if everyone thought the problem was solely in the external factor, the Devil. But this place is very, very bad for good people, and practically no one stands a chance of understanding the sense of torture here.
Whose parents would want to raise their child in a way that this world and the Devil operate? He really messed up with the idea of transferring responsibility onto the inhabitants of the world.
The physical vehicle is a maliciously introduced factor of identification.
The Devil found it insufficient to introduce amnesia as the sole entry factor into this world. He needed the security of a vulnerable physical vehicle – a total identifier that one cannot bypass here.
God’s mind is creation. Conscious beings within it have the possibility of attaining the highest level of harmony with the environment in which they are defined. Any other world for which definitions are given and that exists within the first must have reduced parameters compared to the first.
Experiences of certain yogis and testimonies of near-death experiences (NDEs) confirm such a state of affairs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCpBa1xgFv0
The transitions between this world and the one described by individuals who have undergone Near-Death Experiences (NDEs) resemble the mechanism of electrons moving from one shell of an atom to another.
According to Bohr’s model of the atom, electrons are located in discrete energy shells. When an electron absorbs enough energy, it can transition to a higher energy shell. This additional energy input can come in the form of light (photon) or thermal energy. When an electron emits energy, it usually descends to a lower energy shell.
A certain level of yogis has evidently succeeded in making contact with the world that hierarchically exists above this material realm. Now, there is an issue of how to describe the consciousness of these higher beings. However, there is a reverse logical line of events. If a yogi has made contact with a higher world, it means that a higher entity has also made contact with this material world.
One note: material beings (humans) in this world begin with amnesia and then gradually adapt to this world; it becomes normal for them over time. When a conscious being from a higher world makes contact with this world through the yogi’s consciousness, it has not adapted from amnesia to the state in which human beings here are acclimatized.
Now, it is slowly becoming clear where the descriptions of wrathful deities originate. And it’s not just about the perception these deities have of what they “see”; they also have their autonomy.
It seems to me that what is described as nirvana (where elements cease) and what the mind does within consciousness in “NDE experiences” are not in friendly relation.
NDEs simply indicate that consciousness is not a result of brain activity, and a certain kind of mind operates in a dimension without a physical body.