I was thinking about what happened in Syria, and what lessons can be taken from this.
Basically, what’s happening is jihadists killing, looting and pillaging, the Western propagandists lying and whitewashing their crimes and producing fake material in order to blame the Assad regime, and the neighbouring states capturing territory unopposed. Essentially, it looks similar to the collapse of a bee hive or an ant colony, and the first lesson, I think, is about the purpose of the state. Unlike what the liberal idealists imagine, if you remove the state you don’t get a Utopia. You get post-collapse Syria and Libya, or, in other words, you get hell on Earth. You get criminals in power instead of in prison, you get rule of the strongest, you get murder as a possible answer to absolutely every question, you get a division of society into warlords and slaves, you get unlimited slave trade and you get neighbouring states taking over the territory. Nobody gives a damn about “human rights” or similar nonexistent bullshit. You get violence, misery and suffering, and the only thing that limits human depravity is religious fanaticism, which in case of Islam is hardly a limitation.
You get a zombie horde with automatic weapons, pickups and motorcycles, and you get victims. Soon thereafter, you get starvation, sickness and everything else that leads to a dramatic population drop. Then the dust settles and the survivors make rules that are meant to avoid the depravities that led to this outcome, and the cycle of civilisation slowly repeats. Alternatively, the aggressive neighbours who split the territory between themselves and introduce the rule of law limit the bad outcomes before it comes to that point. Unfortunately, history shows that this is actually not a likely outcome; the territory formerly known as Libya, for instance, was left to the warring fractions of fanatics there, and slave markets are a normal thing for years already. Early years of the Soviet reign after the fall of the Russian Empire saw widespread famine and cannibalism, murder, persecution and all kinds of depravity. After the fall of Rome, during plagues and wars of the early dark ages, Europe was a hell on Earth.
So, this is what the state is for. The purpose of the state is not to distribute wealth to the poor, indoctrinate people or legislate “carbon credits”. The purpose of the state is to keep the savages in prison and afraid. The purpose of the state is to keep the borders controlled so that the people inside can be protected in their culture, beliefs and customs. The purpose of the state is to keep the normal people safe, and enemies afraid. What happens when the state collapses is unlimited human freedom, which translates as unlimited human depravity, and lack of civilised options that would create the playing field for freedom to practice non-depraved things in safety. The only thing that stops unlimited depravity is the controlled savagery of religious zealotry.
Heaven isn’t good because people there are free. It’s good because people there are good. The concept of freedom defined as the ability to do whatever you want is inherently flawed, because if evil people can do whatever they want, you get the hell that is Libya and Syria, where their freedom negates all options for others; basically, you no longer have the option to do normal civilised things because you’ll be killed. On the other hand, in heaven everything is limited by not wanting to do anything depraved, and by the fact that those who would want to automatically teleport into hell. As a result, not having certain “freedoms” creates all kinds of beauty and possibility – you can create art without jihadists raping and murdering you, for instance, because they are not allowed to. You can have things without being robbed and murdered. You can study science without being recruited into some army’s cannon fodder. You can live a long time because nobody’s trying to murder you, which in itself opens up all kinds of options. It’s interesting how Satanists keep harping about freedom from authority. Please, do everyone a favour and go live in Syria. See how you like freedom from all authority. Yeah, it’s hell, in ways I cannot even begin to describe, because freedom from authority doesn’t mean that you are free to do whatever you want. It means that both you and the most savage criminal who rapes, pillages and murders for fun can do whatever you both feel like doing. So, you like to listen to music, and he likes to flay people alive and listen to them scream. In a place with freedom from all authority, that guy forms an armed gang, and you get to be a victim. You don’t get to live in an autistic Utopia where you get to do your thing unopposed. You get to be a slave and a victim, or you learn to be so savage and murderous that even the warlords fear you. Freedom from authority causes reduction of the pool of available options to almost nothing, and freedom thus cancels itself. If everything is allowed, almost nothing is possible. Where evil is not allowed, almost everything becomes possible.
Sorry for offtopic question, but what do you think, what is going on with those unknown drones which apear over America?
I can't be certain, of course, but I would state with over 99% probability that they are American in origin and that it's some kind of a trial run of drone swarms – either for supervision, or contamination detection in case of nuclear attack. Basically, I think they are flying those to have cameras and detectors in the air in case of another Oreshnik attack on their bases and other facilities, which they fear might be coming because they intentionally crossed the line multiple times in attempts to provoke exactly that kind of a response. The problem with the Americans is that they have all kinds of rogue agencies that don't exactly notify anyone of their actions, and since they are a nation of liars they are always paranoid of deception, so there's all kinds of guessing going on.
While there are sightings that are explainable that way, there are also those that don't fit. The phenomenon is complex and there is a lot of noise. From what I can tell, there's three types in the sky: military helicopters (manned) and drones (unmanned), and then actual NHI UAPs (non-human-intelligence unidentified aerial phenomena).
There has been an intriguing remote viewing attempt directed at this situation. Blind target as per usual protocol, only got coordinates and didn't know what she was watching until after the viewing was done (at least that's what she claims).
Part 1 – first look, general overview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ng1-w1WqiM
Part 2 – deeper into the NHI behind this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPPCQnk7n0E
Part 3 – US military/security, what they are doing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTKNyX1Hidw
Basic summary: the NHI are cataloguing sentient beings to preserve the memory for later. Something cyclical will happen with the Sun directed towards Earth. The situation is escalating, they're worried about hothead reactions. There are NHIs at multiple locations showing up in greater numbers than before.
Maybe your people can try viewing the situation and see what's up.
"Basic summary: the NHI are cataloguing sentient beings to preserve the memory for later." – American bases look like a very poor choice for that. 🙂
BTW, historically speaking remote viewing has dismal record.
It's a summary, mainly from the one NHI she was focusing on. Another purpose is that they want to be seen. A third purpose is that they turn off nuclear warheads, but that wasn't in the remote viewing attempt.
For that, you can check out this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4wL4lbwwNU
There's much more. Sure, remote viewing has its flaws. I have no horse in this race, I've shared the info and you can dismiss it if you wish.
From what I can tell, those "remote viewers" figured out that something's up, and just interpolated the rest. It's very similar to how I play with possible scenarios when I don't know what's about to happen, only they treat their guesswork like fact.
That's not how remote viewing works. They get a blind target as a set of coordinates. They don't know what they're supposed to be watching. It's not interpolation or guesswork but direct viewing. They are drawing and describing what they see. It's the same as when you and yours "view" something, which is why I said to see for yourselves.
I realize there's a chasm between thinking NHI and UAP are bullshit and realizing it's a complex but real phenomenon. I've been there and I was just as dismissive. The problem is, there's too much of it to simply dismiss, and it's not intellectually honest. It doesn't describe reality well enough.
I admit a few remote viewing sessions aren't the best introduction to this. But it's something you're uniquely able to check for yourself.
"That's not how remote viewing works." – how it works is that those "viewers" always end up with spectacular stories about all kinds of shit. I've been following that stuff since Andrija Puharić and they always make up shit about aliens, huge underground installations where secret services (always of the enemy nation) perform terrible experiments on humans, satanic secret societies abducting children for sacrificial rituals etc.
It's all bullshit. And I know it's bullshit because I've been down that road when I was just beginning to train my "sight", and I know exactly how you end up there. Most of it is multiple sources, poor training and brain interpolating stuff to fill in the gaps. In worst cases, the "medium" is psychotic and/or fraudulent.
Also, I've been watching "spiritual people" very closely in the 1990s, with particular attention to the current trends. They all "see" stuff that confirms the groupthink, and anyone who doesn't "see" that bullshit gets attacked by the "authentic seekers". They all flock to the same shit like stupid geese – and some of that shit was really stupid, like 12-strand DNA, reiki "healing", "channeling" aliens and "enlightened masters", and so on. I've never seen so many psychotic and delusional people in one place as on the spiritual forums.
Maybe the scariest thing I've seen is when I visited one famous "future teller" to check her out, and I've felt a very dark spiritual presence in her context. There's all kinds of shit involved, and someone being merely crazy is nowhere near the worst part. I think people actually trade aspects of their spiritual autonomy by putting trust in those "psychics".
I don't disagree with this. However, the UAPs are still a real phenomenon.
The channeled bullshit is something to completely avoid. From what I can tell, it's astral entities feeding on people's attention. There are so many examples of people being led by the nose by such entities. There is a deafening amount of noise obscuring the signal in this field.
But then you have the example of cattle mutilation. You have farmers who don't think it's a joke when their livelihood is endangered, nobody can help them and they get ridiculed for speaking out. Then you dismiss it all as tall tales, until you hear the state of the found cattle. They are exsanguinated without traces of blood spilled, their anus and genitals are precisely cored out with some sort of laser cut, tongue cut out, and so on. No wild animal can do that.
But then comes in someone like Linda Moulton-Howe who was a brilliant, respected reporter and took this matter seriously, winning awards. But today she's completely fallen over to the weirdo side, and if you check her out, she doesn't leave a good impression.
When the first big sightings happened in the 50s and 60s, the US military didn't know what to do with it. So they created a huge misdirection and misinformation campaign, ridiculing anyone who tried to report it. They had no counter to the UAPs turning off their nuclear weapons so they invested heavily into making it look like UAPs didn't exist. They did such a good job that the stigma persists to this day.
Interestingly, this wasn't the Soviet approach. Their pilots didn't have to fear ridicule if they reported something – they just had to report it. Who knows how well that worked in practice, but that was the order.
This is why they have no response to the UAP flap in New Jersey. Because they can't do much about it. Except muddy the waters by sending their own drones up.
It seems that my assessment of the drone thing was pretty much accurate. It was the Americans doing it, as Trump revealed, but it's still unclear why, and why did they intentionally keep up the false impression that they don't know what's going on.
By the way, there are rumors of a weird worldwide fog. This makes air maneuvers of any kind difficult. It makes it hard to see what's up in the sky from below. It also makes it hard to see from above to what's on the ground. There are lots of possible implications, and the term "fog of war" may be taken almost literally.
Fog is normal for winter, however there are reports of these fogs in India as well (alongside a cold wave). There have been lots of air travel disruptions because of it.
In the case of UAPs, it's something the Russians have been following for decades as well. The Soviets had a policy of documenting every sighting, regardless of how strange and archiving everything.
And yes, I'm aware remote viewing is flawed.