There’s been lots going on regarding r/WallStreetBets and I’ve been paying attention, of course. Let’s summarize.
r/WallStreetBets is a Reddit group where traders evaluate investment options. The opinions on who they actually are, are divided, but it is my opinion that at least a percentage of them are professionals: expert traders who do this for a living, some of whom used to work for Wall St. hedge funds, investment banks etc. I’ve seen media portrayal of r/WallStreetBets as a band of disenfranchised millennials who are trading with welfare money out of their moms’ basements, and this image is very misleading. The part of them being millennials might be true, but think Elon Musk. Some of those people could invest 10M USD just for shits and giggles. I’ve seen reports of some players using 640M USD. Those are not what you would expect to see if you trusted the “main stream” media, were you by some chance foolish enough to do so. No. The top 1% percent or so of r/WallStreetBets are basically super-wealthy people who habitually invest in the stock market, and have a very large portfolio, and a comparatively small amount they can gamble away on questionable things.
One of those questionable things is investing in shares of failed or deeply distressed companies, where the Wall St. professionals, namely the hedge funds, are betting on them going belly-up in the very recent future, and are invested in short-selling their shares, which basically means “borrowing” shares now, to be paid at a later date at the price as it is on that date, and selling them now, at the current price. If the price goes down as expected, they sell expensive, buy cheaper and pocket the difference. In cases where they are betting that the company will declare bankruptcy before they need to purchase the shares, they gamble by “borrowing” more shares than there actually are in existence; one such case was “caught” by the r/WallStreetBets analysts, who found out that the shares of GameStop are shorted at a record rate of 140% of total shares in existence, which means the hedge funds who were betting heavily on the company going belly-up in the short term could be caught with their pants down if the price of the shares happened to be driven up by, let’s say, record demand from a huge number of Internet traders from r/WallStreetBets. Initially, it was seen as an opportunity to make money, because the investment funds will be forced to buy the shares at higher prices to close their short positions, but very quickly it evolved into “payback time, bitches”, because those hedge funds apparently have many things to account for, such as people’s homes being foreclosed, or people’s businesses struggling because all the credit money circulates in the upper echelons of Wall St., never trickling down into the actual economy, and they are seen as someone with a deep insider connection with any sitting government, because they finance politicians from both parties, and so the government keeps bailing them out whenever their gambles fail to pay off. This was seen as a “let’s see you get out of this” situation, and that is when large groups of young/disenfranchised people started gambling on GameStop shares with money they couldn’t afford to lose, basically throwing their livelihoods on the line in an attempt to damage the “system” they perceived as inherently oppressive.
At some point the GameStop shares jumped from the initial $17.25 to $483, but later fell down to $225. It is my opinion that this will be hugely profitable for those who bought below $100 and sold above $400, but I also expect the short-sellers to have bailed themselves out quite early, and then used the momentum to make money out of it, and the millions of amateur traders who came to the party too late, and those who naively hold on to the stock for too long, will be left with the bag, even poorer than they were before. This just can’t end well for the majority of investors because the fundamentals of GameStop aren’t good enough to justify anything even approaching this astronomic valuation. What needs to be seen is whether the hedge funds that were caught with their pants down already closed their short positions accepting a limited loss, because if that is so, remaining in GameStop shares might actually help the hedge funds recuperate their previous losses. The ability of professionals to out-manoeuvre hysterical mobs who think in memes and emotions should not be underestimated. r/WallStreetBets movement can basically execute only one manoeuvre at the time, because if they try to introduce complexity, they disperse, and, although the “leaders” of the movement are highly competent and intelligent, the mob they are guiding has huge inertia, measured in days, in a job where seconds can make all the difference. It is therefore my opinion that it is quite possible for the movement to produce real and significant effects, but it is also almost certain that most of them will incur heavy losses.
There was talk about r/WallStreetBets trying to influence the silver market, silver being the most “shorted” thing in existence today. As a result, the silver prices spiked and the retail sellers of physical silver sold out their inventory within a day. People on r/WallStreetBets concluded that the idea must come from the hedge funds themselves, who are trying to disperse the attack on GameStop, but I would not be so sure. In fact, I think r/WallStreetBets “short squeeze” of GameStop seems to have given some very smart people an idea, because it is known in the precious metals market that the prices of silver and gold are being artificially suppressed for a very long time, and the supply side hasn’t really recovered from the shortages that became visible around April last year. Also, Tesla is really ramping up their car production, and they need significant amounts of silver to put each of those cars on the road. r/WallStreetBets might actually have very little to do with the rising prices of silver and gold, because I expected those to rise before GameStop was even a thing, for completely unrelated reasons, having everything to do with the fundamentals. Sure, I wouldn’t mind someone accelerating the process, but I certainly don’t rely on that alone.
My opinion on gold and silver is known, as is the fact that I’m heavily invested in gold, and to a much lesser degree in silver, because I expect the financial system to be restructured with gold as one of the main pillars of currency, together with real-estate mortgages and sovereign bonds. For that to happen, the price of gold will have to go up by an order of magnitude, and I don’t know what silver will do. Also, I expect the real-estate prices to collapse, because they are currently maintained at this level by artificial means. The entire system – governments, banks, stock market, businesses – is presently stretched beyond the expected breaking point and the only thing keeping it together is a combination of inertia and unwarranted optimism. This overextended rubber band will break, and when it does, I don’t want to be anywhere near. I see this stock market madness of inflating certain shares far beyond their fundamentals as a symptom of desperation, and historically it is a precursor to the collapse.
Sure, there is good money to be made in this phase, if you’re positioned well, you know what you’re doing and are willing to gamble, but my assessment is that when this thing starts to unravel, huge amounts of money will start collapsing into precious metals as the only remaining safe haven, and I want to be there already when that happens. The only reason why we haven’t had hyperinflation in the Eurodollar zone already is because all of the money is basically locked in the upper echelons of finance and business, none of it trickling down to the masses, so basically the wealthy have so much cash they can’t decide what to spend it on, and the masses are starved for basic liquidity and fundamentally disenfranchised. Also, the system is so hyper-regulated, it is almost impossible to do business at all. If you think this can end well, I have a piece of real estate on the Moon to sell you.
It appears that this opinion seems to be widely shared today, judging by the massive GME selloff below $100.
I’m reserving my judgement until I see “fails to deliver” data for at least second half of January, which is not out yet, and which will show how much of this selloff is simply new uncovered (naked) puts and shorts (“selling stock you don’t have”), and how much is actually retail traders selling. Selloff was to be expected, especially since demand was cut off as retail traders were prevented from buying GME (the point which will surely be beaten to death at the US Senate hearings about the event).
The thing is, after yesterday, the mainstream media basically proclaimed that everything is over, but stocks don’t simply stop trading forever after the market bell. A lot of retail traders went into this not (just) for profits, but out of spite, expecting to lose. Like, “you boomer funds can go bankrupt, but I can’t, I’ll just put another month of my bartending earnings into GME”. The real question is, as it has always been, is the number of shares held by retail investors larger than the amount needed to cover shorts. If it is, the main fireworks are yet to come, and even if they aren’t, arguably, WallStreetBets already won, as the practice of buying uncovered shorts is now in the spotlight, and however Senate, SEC and other institutions choose to deal with it, at least some of the people and the media will turn to WSB to hear the other side of the story as well.
BTW, mainstream media is, as usual, bad at their coverage of the event to the point it’s embarrassing; for a very good overview of yesterday, I’d recommend listening to this podcast.
I would just say that someone who thinks in terms of: “you boomer funds can go bankrupt, but I can’t, I’ll just put another month of my bartending earnings into GME” is bankrupt as fuck. 🙂
Technically, he can’t go bankrupt, because he already is. 🙂
Fun stuff. Apparently official short interest formula was changed to include synthetic long shares (which are not real shares, they are generated through clever use of options), but in the process they fudged another metric, so official “Institutional Ownership” for GME is now 111.03% which doesn’t make any sense unless shorts are still not fully covered. Not sure if anything will come out of this, but at this point I’m really rooting for those WSB retards, they obviously struck at the real shitpile. 🙂
So this game ain’t over yet, I see.
I think that it’s safe to say that most hedge funds being squeezed are out at this point, although institutional ownership figure is now 122%. Trade data is out, unfortunately ending with the day after the RobinHood restricted buying, and failed-to-deliver fell from it’s high of 2099572 shares on 26th Jan to a 6% of that (138179 shares) on 29th when retail investors were prevented from buying.
The Congress hearing (first of three) on GameStop is probably the most hilarious thing I’ve watched in a long time. A lot of it was political virtue signalling, and I don’t think much will come out of it directly, but that’s a good thing, as the only thing that could come out of it is more regulation, which is what caused the issue in the first place, which was also mentioned to my pleasant surprise.
Another pleasant surprise were several mentions of using blockchain for settlement to move from T+2 (two days) to T+0. This is a no-brainer and this hearing will certainly speed things up in that regard. Blockchain or not, the technology to move from archaic settlement procedures that exist because it took a few days for a rider to deliver papers has existed for decades.
Highlights include /u/DeepFuckingValue aka Roaring Kitty testifying that he’s actually not a cat and Bloomberg TV explaining /r/WSB lingo including stonks and tendies. :))) Now every Wall Street professional basically has to read /r/WSB as a part of his day job which is beyond hilarious.
Winners and losers? I don’t know. /u/DeepFuckingValue made a trade of a century, transforming $53k to $48M. RobinHood increased their valuation by bringing in new investors. Melvin Capital lost a lot of dough, but also secured new capital. /r/WSB is the new kid in town, and is now taken seriously. Some retail investors made a lot of money, some lost a lot of money, and same goes for the Wall Street professionals – I really think that both groups had individuals with both outcomes. The whole event exposed some vulnerable insides of trading mechanisms, which will be improved in the future. A lot of retail investors got their first entry into markets, which is partly a good thing, and partly a bad thing, since some of them will lose money, but on the other hand, that makes markets more inclusive which is not a bad thing.
My interpretation of what happened today, in hindsight:
Last week, probably Thursday or Friday, the hedge fund traders had an emergency meeting, where they figured out what’s going on, they agreed that they had to cut the losses, they got the credit line to do it, and they were out at $250 or even lower. Then they saw that they are dealing with a predictable opponent who basically swore to hold the line until death, and they saw this as an opportunity to recuperate losses and even make money. They started buying at $250 and up, started selling at $480, sold everything, and today they published the graph that shows that they are already fully out, which means everybody who’s still in is just going to die for nothing, which started a selloff, at which point they shorted the stock, which accelerated the stampede to the door, closed their short positions at $80, which caused the price to rise again, and now they are laughing all the way to the bank. As I commented below one YouTube video:
“If there’s a lesson to this, it’s that apes together weak.
The hedge fund traders are faster, smarter and simply better.”