I recently talked about scripts and attractors, and I’m currently dealing with one that is probably the most obscure, weird and scary things I ever saw. You see, attainment of liberation/enlightenment during life is one. Specifically, the “during life” part.
Let’s first deal with the definition of the goal, according to Vedanta and Buddhism. Vedanta is not a singular teaching; advaita according to Shankaracarya defines liberation as a state of direct and perfect realization of oneness of atman and brahman, which burns up all seeds of future karma and all connections with the illusory world (maya). This is moksha, or mukti. If this is attained during life, it’s referred to as jivanmukti.
Dualistic teachings, like those of Ramanuja, Madhva and Caitanya, have much more in common with Islam and Christianity than they do with advaita Vedanta, which is probably because India was under Muslim occupation when they were developed, and the Muslims tended to violently eradicate philosophies that contradicted Islam. This is how we ended up with the versions of Hinduism that basically believe in a monotheistic deity and see liberation as ending up in heaven with this deity after death. In dualistic Vaishnavism, reincarnation is not seen as necessarily bad, because even deities seem to incarnate in this world occasionally, when it fits their purposes, but involuntary reincarnation caused by karmic necessity or attachment is. In general, being “conditioned” by anything is seen as bad, because it is the opposite of freedom. Basically, being born here because you wanted to follow God who was born here to do something is an act of unconditional free will, and as such it is fine; being born here because you were forced to by your past karma means your fate is conditioned and not free, and this is not fine. Essentially, the dualists see the goal as developing such spiritual refinement that you are no longer attracted by anything other than God, and resolving all kinds of past karmic obligations and not creating new ones, in order to prevent loss of freedom, or conditioning of will.
Buddhists are more complicated. Because nirvana is defined in ways that are completely inconsistent with normal human existence, they usually don’t think such a goal is attainable during life, but some mahayana schools, such as Zen, believe it is possible to achieve “insight” or “enlightenment” that changes the way one perceives things, and allows one to acquire something between detachment and change of perspective, where things are perceived very acutely and in the present moment, but the self-centered aspect of existence is lost. Between attempts to attain emptiness and attempts of clicking-into a change of perspective, it is quite obvious that Buddhists in general have no idea what nirvana is or how to attain it. This is understandable, because nirvana is defined as something you can’t really understand if you didn’t attain it, but I would say that Buddhist existence is most clearly defined as a confusion of paths and goals. Between trivial accomplishments and confusions, there is a very impressive path of Vajrayana, which I can describe only as “we don’t know what nirvana is, but there are Dakinis, there are higher levels of consciousness they lead us towards, there are blissful and scary spiritual things, and if we achieve those things it might not matter whether we understand nirvana or not, because our personal reality might be a mixture of reality and illusion, and nirvana might very well be the state where the mixture consists of 0% illusion and 100% reality, whatever that is”. This is a very honest approach that seems to have perfect alignment with my personal experience – basically, start somewhere, follow higher reality and avoid illusions and nonsense, and always take God over a good theology.
When we normalize this set by trimming away obvious non-accomplishments and trivialities, we end up with, basically, three viable definitions of enlightenment.
The first is that brahman is the only true reality, and what we are perceiving is a paradox of dual/relative existence which takes place when maya is superimposed upon brahman. When we permanently depart from this illusion of duality, we are free.
The second is that there is God, there are all sorts of spiritual entities of various degrees of purity and complexity, that inhabit all kinds of planes of existence according to their levels of sophistication, purity and attachment, and the goal is to attain greatest sophistication, purity and detachment which will allow us to dwell in the highest of the realms, together with God and his saints.
The third is that we live a complex mixture of reality and illusion, which includes our spiritual bodies, which can evolve in sophistication, complexity and purity; if we really try to make progress, we will be offered help by Dakinis, which are in essence angelic beings that manifest nirvana to us, in our limited condition, and if we follow their guidance our perception will consist of more reality and less illusion, which also means that our spiritual bodies will look less like a chaotic mess, and more like a jewel of vajra. Nirvana might just be a fancy name for a state of our spiritual body where it is hard, coherent and pure vajra, and solving actual problems and attaining actual goals is preferable to having a clean theory that explains everything, especially since our bodies just might be incapable of formulating a theory that is both accurate and useful, since a higher reality is by definition something that cannot be either contained or described in terms of a lower reality.
The great advantage of the third definition is that it is pragmatic, useful for attaining actual spiritual results, and useless for intellectual posturing. This can never be overstated, because it is my experience that advaita Vedanta produces incredible intellectual contentment by providing “final answers”, and the result is that its followers are basically stupid people with a very high opinion of themselves and their “Self-realization”. They obviously don’t look like they achieved anything near an actual ultimate reality, and it’s more like they fell into some kind of a trap for egotistical pricks. The second definition, that of dualistic Vedanta (which includes Christianity and Islam) has one important advantage over advaita, which is that it inherently doesn’t allow one to be content with his level of achievement during this life, if he has any brains in him, because it is obvious that the final judgment of his achievement will be made by God after this life, when his fate will be determined. This, by definition, should discourage fucking around and having any pride in one’s salvation or its certainty, but of course there are stupid people who manage to miss even that obvious fact.
But let’s return to the matter at hand, which is the global attractor I’m presently having the misfortune of dealing with. It deals with spirituality here. Even the people who believe that salvation is only determined after this life are not immune to its influence, because it deals with a very broad spectrum of “achievements”, spiritual ones included, and it is very easy to convince one that he needs to accomplish or attain something here as a pre-condition of salvation. This “here” part is the trap, and if it ensnares you, you will basically attempt to pull the entire world with you to God, because you will not want to let go. Bushmen of Kalahari catch monkeys that way, by offering them something they want, but in a very tight space, so that if they close their hand around the object of desire, they can’t pull out their hand and escape, so the choice is between having the object of desire and escaping. The monkeys invariably wish to have both – to escape with the thing they want – and they invariably end up as lunch.
People want to have the kingdom of heaven, but they want it here. They want enlightenment, here. They want supernatural powers, here. The here part creates a mantric contradiction which binds you to this world, and not only that, but it invests the energy of your efforts into feeding the importance, necessity and reality of this world, thus making it stronger, and you weaker. The funniest thing is, the same attractor that makes people want a Rolex or a Ferrari also deals with this. As strange and crazy as it seems, wanting a Rolex in this world and wanting to achieve liberation during life are equivalent attachments.
Also, if you want to achieve things here, you need to have its owner’s permission. What part of your very real soul are you willing to give Satan, the Prince of this world, in trade for an “achievement” in this illusory place? I figured that part out long ago, when I read something in Yogananda’s autobiography, about a saint who used atoms of his previously cremated physical body to manifest a temporary physical body in order to encourage disciples after his death. Why specifically the atoms of his body? Why not any atoms at random, when he has the power over arranging atoms into physical structures, anyway? Why not just condensed light? Why did Jesus have to resurrect his physical body, not just manifest another structure by condensing light into matter? Because they don’t have permission from Satan, but they do have permission over their physical body that they obtained under the original incarnation contract, and they hacked this arrangement. See the problem? Want something here, you have to come to Satan for it, and of course he’s going to give it to you, out of the kindness of his heart, without asking for anything in return. Right.
You need to let go. You are already on the other side, so there’s no reason to fear it. This place doesn’t actually exist, except as an illusion-generator. It does, however, block your vision and memory, feed you reflections of real things projected onto illusory things, and promote attachments. You don’t have to go to the spirit-world; your spirit never left it, because the best hidden secret of this place is that matter can’t actually contain spirit; your soul is not actually in the physical world, it’s still “up there”, only under an influence of a very strong and persistent illusion, and the part of why we seem to be stuck here is because we are deluded into thinking that we need it for spiritual purposes. We don’t. Let go.
Relationship between self-taught practice and inherited or instructed form of a thing called Vajrayana.
I was lookup on the web for an explanation of Vajrayana.
I was looking for an explanation of essence and something concrete, at least explained sincerely and as such recognizable.
In that category I find only sculptures as genuine presentations of phenomena. And I saw complete nonsense in different levels of teachings and practice which leads to the painful loop of mental repetition of mantra of “compassion” wishes and boring rituals. It is obviously a problem in something that is being taught as an idea in the form of a role model without the essence being contained or reached. It has the questionable form of transmission of something that was historically and personally realized by an individual and not as an experience of many.
If we have to use existing terms, then Vajrayana in execution is more like powerful yidam and vipassana in the mixed finish. It is the Olympic gold medal equivalent and not an ” it is important to work together, not to win” or even more stupid “we run for others”.
In the end, useful skill is not only a dry algorithm, it has to include and use sincerity, gentleness, immediacy, intelligence, and a few things from here and there which can be seen in rare situations in nature which are kind of magic in their beauty and substance.
I asked myself once, if I were a Deity, when would I decide to approach myself as
a non-yet Deity, what would be enough for that move?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9onvOJntew
I won’t go into what this man explains, but he left a good impression.
You need to have in mind that when I reduce some system to the basics, that I trim out all the “excess fat” and nonsense and concentrate on what I see as the functional core. Sometimes that puts a system in a more favorable light than what one would normally infer from reading up on the subject, for instance when I tell some story from the Bhagavata-purana, people usually find out that my version “feels” much higher, purer and more sophisticated than the translations they can find on the Internet or in the Hare Krishna books. That’s because I refine, purify and enhance.
You know, I admire your article so much that I decide not to write anything for three days.
You have done everything right, it is perfectly clear to me and your text fortifies me generously with their clarity.
I just want to react in relation to that what I found on the web. Ordinary people can be confused with the content of those weird Monty Python’s Flying Circus stuff.
Some Buddhist lineages do initiate people from the West into lamas, in this particular case there are several initiates as they are all “sukhasiddhi foundation” teachers.
The first problem come out when I saw their photos. As they are not hiking society but they handling Buddhism which is handling with dukkha at its core, then it’s unnatural that they are smiling like staff on some ocean cruiser. Satan is known for nice, big, and comfortable cruisers for their staff.
Then all problems only rise up with their messages and teachings.
And they all are nothing less than initiated lamas. They are teachers of competent lineages of Buddhism.
It’s not that people are bad, bad and bad and that they do not have an eye for right deeds.
https://www.chaplainoftheheart.com/journal/my-first-buddhist-teacher
The problem is in that, that Satan’s system is grinding people with false signposts and patiently waiting to get depleted them for energy not allowing them to rise away from the trajectory he dreamed.
If you run the grain through the mill several times, you will end up with flour.
I’m sick of how that works.
Everybody has limited resources in the form of energy, vitality and lifetime.
“Everybody has limited resources in the form of energy, vitality and lifetime.”
Even that is a step back, the real insight lies in the last paragraph of Daniel’s article.
That shit of Satan’s power can not drive you directly (sick bastard doesn’t have access to anyone’s spirit) , he can only manipulate thru the level of indirect suggestions like emotions and animal instincts inherently attached to the vehicle of an illusory material body.
He can knead you only indirectly thru the contracted game interface.
https://resources.tsemtulku.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/3/files/vajrayogoni/Vajrayogini_Qing_Dynasty_01.jpg
Consciousness behind that eyes does not negotiate with Satan’s game interface. That doesn’t give a shit for a contract!
How could Satan make a patch for this kind of consciousness when he has no such thing in him even in a trace?
You can go up and that can go down from yidam.
“That thing”, that consciousness, doesn’t look human?
Of course not, it is not. It is not wired to the game interface.
It is not: aaaaahhh, I’m burnt on a candle, I’m wet and I’m cold on the wind, I’m hurt when my body falls on the concrete, I’m rejected by a girl, boss bullying me, I’m hungry, I’m sick… my brother died… I’m broke…will I see my relatives in heaven… I’m tired I need some sleep… I want a Bugatti… I’m on a quest for a liberation…
And you know what, that sculpture was made. That is crazy.
U židovskoj mistici, barem ono što čitam u starozavjetnim prorocima buđenje duše zove se spasenje i posvećenje. Tako je pretskazano da će to stanje svetosti doživjeti oni Židovi koji prežive (njih 1/3) teška zla i ratove posljednjeg vremena (harmagedon) prije kraja svijeta a u tom stanju će prednjačiti stanovnici Jeruzalema. Tako se za njih kaže “Niko nikoga, od najmanjeg do najvećeg neće učiti o Bogu jer će ga svi poznavati”. Uzrok tom buđenju je očišćenje grijeha pa Jahve obećaje “Očistit ću grijehe njihove i više se neću spominjati grijeha njihovih”. Glavno sredstvo čišćenja grijeha (e to je problematika) sagledava se kroz patnju (koje će donijeti ti ratovi) i kajanja. Nema tu priče o vremenu sagledavanja vrline i vrlinskog života, učenja o Bogu i slično. No što će se sve događati vidjet ćemo. U svakom slučaju post armagedonski svijet proroštvo sagledava Jeruzalem kao centar duhovnosti i hodočašća preživjelih u svijetu. Prekretnicu u nadolazećem rati i proroštvo i Židovi vide u instaliranju uloge Mesije u Izraelu. Židovi nemaju jasnu sliku kako će on postati moćan a proroštva ga vide kao drugi dolazak Isusa Odozgora. Sagledavajući sebe ja imam relativno velika znanja o Kristu i impersonalnom Bogu Duhu Svetom, imam zanimljivo duhovno iskustvo iz djetinjstva koje se dogodilo u tri povezana čina kroz sat vremena u kojima mi se očitova o Krist vizuelno na nebu u mnogim predmetima na zemlji a prije toga mi je spasio život. Imam znanja koja treba da ima kršćanski i židovski svijet a koja se u biblijskoj mistici samo naziru, no ja nisam Židov i ne znam koji plan Krist ima samnom, znanja koja mi je najavio da ću imati postigao sam ali nisu realizirana kroz javni marketing i knjigu. Očito postaje da će to znanje biti dio samo mog individualnog duhovnog puta jer jasno je da nadolazeća vremena kaosa i zla ne traže neko spoznajno buđenje svijeta.
edit mi ne radi…htio sam izmjeniti riječ “realizirana” u “prezentirana” u predzadnjoj rečenici….