Brain and heart damage caused by the COVID “vaccine”:
Getting “vaccinated” or complying with the government’s mandates just to get along, fit in, not be bullied or discriminated against, is a dangerous sport. It’s not a free and safe choice.
8 thoughts on “Dangers of compliance”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
When m-RNA vaccines against Coronavirus were launched, a legitimate question arose as to whether the new technology m-RNA vaccine would incorporate temporary or permanent spike-protein generation into the body. Will the m-RNA command be permanently active in the body?
In other words, whether the intervention of the m-RNA vaccine will cease after a certain period of time.
That is one line of the problem.
The next – the second – is the question of whether the body gets rid of the spike-protein completely after a certain period of time once it has received the m-RNA vaccine. So – does the immunosystem clear the body of all the spike-protein that the vaccine has seeded after a certain period of time?
Is there any relevant information on this? Because those who have accepted the vaccine should know what they can count on. Are they facing a lifetime of terror from the m-RNA spike-protein and a permanent provocation of the immunosystem.
When the m-RNA vaccine was introduced, I searched the web and found the explanation that the vaccine would only temporarily generate the spike-protein and that, over time, the record would cease to function, that it would not be permanently incorporated into the body as a record.
These are the vital questions that are now arising as the consequences of the m-RNA vaccine come to the surface. Does this vaccine-crap ever stop working inside the body? Once these questions have been answered in a qualitative way, then the next step can be pursued.
Or will we have to wait for the passage of time and draw our own conclusions from the statistics of events? Scientists can see what is happening inside the body as a consequence of vaccination, but the question is whether they have a free hand to interpret any lasting damage suffered by living people.
The spike protein isn’t inert, it’s actively harmful. How anyone got the idea of using this protein for inocculation is already hard to understand; how *all* vaccine manufactures decided to use it, looks like either complete madness or a conspiracy.
You can’t really use anything else, I think, as the spike protein is the part that comes into contact with cells and penetrates them – there’s nothing else T cells can use to recognize the virus.
The convenient part is that virus “payload” is almost completely irrelevant in this case. It is as if it was intelligently and intentionally designed like that in order to make traditional vaccine approach completely ineffective.
EDIT: Well, not completely, let me rephrase that – less effective.
It’s a shame that molecular biology is by no means my forte – I understand the basics, but one would really need to be at the PhD level to be able to peer-review the scientific materials about how this actually works and see errors in it. Can’t do it all, I guess.
First we all had to became armchair seismologists, then epidemiologists, then supply chain experts, then geostrategists. I wonder what I will have to learn next. Hopefully not how to be a farmer… or a cannibal.
If only we could simply trust somebody, for example, the government experts and media to present all relevant information in easily digestable and actionable format… 🙂
It’s not all difficult, for instance the stuff based on physics is easy for me, be it astrophysics, nuclear physics or seismology, but virology and molecular biology are too much of a tangent for me, similar to the Chinese language or something; I never researched anything similar and I would have to really invest effort, and I don’t really care enough to do so, because in the recent years I researched so many things, I’m kinda done. 🙂
A few years ago, I read about a gene-editing technique called CRISP/Cas9 and the Nobel Prize associated with its discovery.
Then I saw on YouTube an explanation of how this new technology has been used to cure a genetically inherited severe disease called sickle cell disease. They expected that after using the new healing technique, the genes would be corrected but the problems would be reduced by around 20%. The results were better than expected, the disease and the problems were reduced by 80%, and the patients were practically cured, as the edited genes began to give the orders to build healthy blood cells.
Who would have expected one ideological agenda to be so crazy that things would go down a new path that looks like the one below?
A 92-year-old living being preaching about events in the world today, taking positions and making judgments. He is personally a speaker on the video of the Munich Conference and he is a billionaire.
Coloured revolutions, yes of course, he never heard of!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhRsv3ycJGU
The Indian Foreign Secretary made a clear comment to a 92 year old being who is going around the world with a plan that he is funding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUJr8yPF0f4
Watch John Campbell’s YouTube channel linked in the post for some of the answers to those questions.
From what I gather (and I’m way out of my depth here, so take it with a grain of salt), yes, the body does get rid of spike protein relatively quickly. However, it depends on the tissue, and spike protein can do a lot of damage while it’s there, and that damage might not go away quickly (or ever).
One huge issue is vaccines being administered improperly. They are supposed to be injected into muscle, but if you don’t try to draw (aspirate) a bit of blood to see if you’ve hit a blood vessel before injecting it, you can inject it directly into the blood, from where it can travel to brain or heart where it can do a lot of damage.
I’m not really positive that mRNA vaccines as a technology are an issue at all in a medical sense (politically, there are a lot of issues when mandating new technology in a way it was done), although it is a new technology and definitely not tested enough. You’ll have increased levels of spike protein in all cases, as non-mRNA vaccines deliver spike proteins to your body as well, and since spike protein is the one causing issues, I’m not sure you can really “kill it” and have inactivated virus when you separate it from the virus payload.
Major issues observed so far are neurological and heart issues. Virus itself additionally causes pulmonary issues, but I don’t remember seeing a lot of those in relation to vaccines only. It’s completely conceivable that spike protein causes lasting damage to other parts of the body, which then become problematic after secondary issues which you might encounter later, but that’s very hard to connect to vaccines afterwards. Also, virus was more likely to kill you initially, especially with comorbidities, but with later variants it adapted to a human body and the probability of virus killing you fell significantly while the probability of vaccine killing you, I guess, remained the same.
There are a lot of details that complicate things, like, for example, I saw a study which found out that vaccinated against original variant might be more susceptive to later variants, even if they are later boosted against newer variants (Hoskins effect).
Also, while mRNA vaccines are not intended to rewrite DNA or leave any permanent record apart from your immune system remembering virus signature, and I haven’t seen any conclusive evidence that they do, mRNA technology can do that, and was successfully used to cure genetic diseases.
So, you’re probably right that we’re going to have to draw our own conclusions with time since media is very selective in informing the public about anything these days.