Blaming the boomers

I just watched a video by Wranglerstar where he blames the “boomers” and their selfish greed for the conditions in the present-day America, and I wasn’t very happy with him, so I wrote a comment which I’m reposting here, so that it wouldn’t get lost:

It has nothing to do with the “boomers”. The problem is that America attracted all the wealth and human capital from Europe that was destroyed in WW2, this human and material wealth created a burst of prosperity, which was spent, and when it was spent, you went into debt in order to continue riding that wave long after its momentum was exhausted. Not only that, but the petrodollar scheme meant that you could export your inflation to the rest of the world, because people outside America had to buy dollars with real assets in order to buy oil, and you could just print the stuff. That’s why the standard of living in America used to be so outrageously higher than anywhere else in the world. It’s not because you have such a great constitution or anything; you were just the only ones undamaged by the two consecutive world wars. Before WW1, there was no difference between you and Argentina or Chile. Now that you spent everything and went tenfold that much into debt, you’re starting to have the kind of life we in Europe had for a very long time, and of course you’re not happy about it, so you started another war in Europe in order to, again, wreck it for everybody else and hope to be the last ones left standing, and repeat the post-WW2 era that went so wonderfully for you. What you might find out is that the times where wars could not reach your shores are long gone, and the rest of the world doesn’t hate you because of your freedom, they hate you because you extracted resources and propagated wars and corruption in other countries, as can be seen in Biden/Burisma files. So, don’t talk to me about boomers, because in my country the boomers worked very hard and had nothing to show for it, and had to grow up in countries pulverized by war, suffered from malnutrition and they still managed to create the post-war Europe, and they had to compete with America – unrazed, with all the world’s gold and all the best engineers and scientists attracted from Europe. You went to the Moon with German scientists and Bretton Woods gold, while my boomer father had rickets from post-war malnutrition and worked very hard every single day translating scientific and engineering materials from and to French and Italian and had to go work as a translator on a construction site in Algeria among vipers, scorpions and heat to be able to afford the down payment for a small apartment. So, you Americans can now cry me a river and I will bathe in your tears.

Bait and switch

Told you so; “the grid can’t handle electric cars so I guess you’ll have to do without cars in the future”. Electric car transition is in fact a way for them to take our cars away, it was never about giving us electric cars, which I figured when I observed that they are not building new nuclear power plants to energetically finance the new anticipated power expenditures from electric cars. The wind and solar power is all a fraud – it’s intermittent, dirty and weak, and the only truly good sources are nuclear, hydroelectric and geothermal. The problem with “green” advocates is that they want to transition everything to electricity “because it’s cleaner” and then they want to ban most sources of electricity, except the “feel good” stuff that actually creates availability and quality issues, not to mention toxic waste, because solar and wind don’t produce electricity from sun and wind, they produce electricity from environmentally toxic hardware that eventually has to be disposed somewhere.

Basically, it’s not about “green” anything, it’s about destroying the underlying assumptions of a technological civilization, which would result in more dead than a nuclear war, and if you think the WEF people don’t know that, you have a surprise coming. The entire thing looks like somebody’s long-term depopulation project, considering how they seem to be undermining the moral and intellectual basis of society, energy, agriculture, manufacturing and finances all at the same time. It’s a full-spectrum degradation. Russia is the only major country that has a sustainable economic structure at the moment, which was actually helped by the sanctions, which is an incredible irony; they have independent energetics, petrochemical industry that produces fertilizers, agriculture, heavy industry capable of producing machinery, they have all the raw materials they would ever need, they have educated people to work on solving actual problems, and they have the morality and worldview to back a healthy society. Basically, the only places where Russia needs to improve things is semiconductor lithography in the single-digit nanometer scale and, possibly, some other specialized areas such as optics, which is more-less trivial and seems to be in the process; what’s actually hard to do is educate scientists and create a morally and intellectually healthy society with a free market economy that incentivizes innovation and progress; technology follows easily.

 

Suspicious developments

In the recent days, a significant number of Ukrainian high government officials have either resigned, been killed, or been fired. This looks like a combination of a night of long knives, infighting in Hitler’s bunker during the 1945 defeat, and some very suspicious possible CIA involvement that would have Zelensky removed and replaced by the supposed “moderates” who would be stalling the Russians for months until their military is re-armed and recovered, because they are presently facing total defeat. I don’t know what’s actually going on there, but something is definitely going on.

Wrong tree

Let me share some of my thinking.

The Russians have a set of goals and a set of constraints. Their main goal is to establish themselves as a free and independent major global player whose security is not compromised by the constant attempts of America to put advanced weapons systems at their borders and finance indoctrination of neighbouring countries’ populace with anti-Russian fascist ideologies. They also want to create the kind of world where all countries participate in mutually beneficial transactions based on international law that is strictly obeyed and enforced. Basically, they wanted to be a free country with good relations with other free countries.

Their main constraint is not having a nuclear war in the process of achieving their goals.

Russian main goal could be realistically possible only if, by some miracle, devil or blue sea swallowed America whole and without a trace. Barring that, America is going to work hard on achieving their goal of total global full-spectrum dominance, where all other countries are reduced to American vassals. While America is in a position of power, controlling finances, military, media and political class of subservient states, and everybody thinks America is militarily invincible and financially omnipotent, America will be able to start more fires than Russia will be able to put out, and it will be able to continue this process until all of its subservient countries have expended their financial, human and military assets fighting Russia, and in the end Russia will be left weakened and still having to fight America with nuclear weapons.

The irony is that the Russian attempt to spare the innocent peoples of Europe creates the strategic framework in which those countries will be completely destroyed first, and their main strategic enemy will be left unharmed and in a position of greatest strength before the final conflict. Russia is playing for the scenario where Europe gradually rebels against the American agenda, but I can’t see that happening; those countries are all in debt, and their debt is controlled by America, who owns the “risk assessment” agencies, who can trivially bankrupt any such country by simply increasing their risk level. Also, America controls fiat currency, and all the political elites and media establishment are American-owned. Everywhere in the American-controlled world, people are in debt, overworked and deeply disenfranchised. Most of them would rather inject themselves with American bioweapons than realise what’s going on.

Russia is trying to play the game of very slow escalation, giving their opponents time to think and change course, and this graduality is, ironically, increasing the probability of everything being swallowed by the pit of chaos. The option that actually has the greatest probability of a good global outcome is a sudden large scale Russian nuclear attack on America and Britain. Barring that, a gradual increase in strength and intensity of blows between parties will slowly grind everything to a Mariupol-like rubble before the inevitable end.

So, Russia is barking at the wrong tree, trying to grind Ukraine and the European armies present there, into a bloody pulp. It’s like trying to stop a car by hitting the brakes, while another person is pressing the trottle. Without America, nothing else would be a problem, because they are the evil and rotten brain behind all the evils we are seeing in the world; with America, you can grind everything else into dust and still be left with the inevitable task of defeating America. Therefore, it’s better to just strike at the heart of the problem immediately and be done with it, while you are still at your peak, rather than wait until you are degraded to the point where the enemy might actually defeat you. The problem is that Putin very strongly doesn’t want to be the person who started the nuclear war, which is the reason why the war might not just become inevitable, but also more likely to be lost.

Rule 34

I finally found out why the Americans are putting pressure on the Germans to give their tanks to Ukraine, while they themselves won’t give them their own Abrams tanks, with an excuse that they are too high-maintennance.

You see, the Americans told all countries who will give their Leopard II tanks to Ukraine that they will receive free Abrams tanks from America’s own stock. Apparently, being high-maintennance is not a problem in this context. The Germans are freaking out because this is removing them from the market for tank purchases and harming their industry.

As the 34th rule of acquisition clearly states, war is good for business.