Implications

What does Russian suspension of START mean, in practice?

The basic assumption is that both sides are out of compliance with its provisions for quite a while now, since the inspections have been defunct for, I don’t know how long, but I would say years. Suspending it means acceptance of the new reality, which, in Russian case, probably means that all strategic nuclear submarines have a full complement of warheads (Bulava has 6-10 MIRV warheads per rocket, which means that my expectation is that they are all fully armed now, when there are no considerations of the upper limits on deployed weapons. By default, they were armed with 6 warheads, accuracy in the circle of 350m. Every Borei submarine is armed with 16 Bulava missiles, which means a (theoretical until confirmation) complement of 160 warheads per submarine, from the previous default of 96. There are 6 active Borei submarines in service, and an additional one recently launched. This means 960 nuclear warheads, realistically 1120, and that’s not counting the one remaining Typhoon submarine, Dimitry Donskoy. In addition to that, there are the old Delta IV strategic submarines, carrying Sineva rockets, circle of accuracy 250-500m. One would be tempted to dismiss those as “obsolete”, but have in mind that they are as old as the American Ohio class submarine fleet, and since they work just fine, the Americans are forced to treat them seriously and dedicate sufficient resources to tracking them. Each carries 16 missiles with 4-10 warheads each, which means that the START restrictions would have them limited to 4 warheads per missile, and the Russians can now fully arm them, to the full complement of 160 warheads per submarine, from the default of 64. Let’s say there are 6 active submarines, which means 960 warheads, from previous 384.

As for the ground-based missiles, the Yars carrier (circle of accuracy 150-200m) is armed with “3-6” warheads, but realistically it’s probably 10, and the lower number implies the START restrictions. There were more than 150 (mobile and stationary) launchers as of November 2019, with the number growing by approximately 20 per year, the total expected number being around 200. This means that the maximum armament of the deployed Yars systems is 2000 warheads, but realistically, the number of rockets is likely around 150 and the number of warheads is closer to 1200. The yield of the warhead is variable, between 100-300kT.

In addition to this, there are 60 older silo-based and 18 mobile RT-2PM2 Topol-M as of March 2020. They carry a single warhead around 1MT (circle of accuracy 200m). Topol-M is being routinely replaced with Yars carriers as they age out of service. Also, there are the old Voevoda missiles from the 1980s, that used to be manufactured in Ukraine and are considered obsolete or nearly so, and are being quickly replaced with Yars and Sarmat designs. As of January 2020, the Strategic Missile Troops had 46 R-36M2s in active service. They used to carry around 10 warheads per missile, 500-800kT per warhead, and potentially a large number of decoys.

The Sarmat rocket is basically new and improved version of Voevoda, of fully Russian design, and with greater payload, designed to carry either large single warheads, MIRV cluster of 10, or multiple (likely 16) Avangard hypersonic reentry vehicles, and many decoys. There were several delays in production but around 50 should be deployed by now, or soon enough. Their circle of accuracy is 10m. Since they are in the early phase of adoption, almost nothing is known about their number and armament, but I would expect them to routinely replace the Voevoda missiles, and the total payload of this complement is expected not to vary greatly – 46 missiles, 10 warheads each, 460 in total.

In addition to this, there are the tactical nuclear weapons – torpedoes, cruise missiles and bombs – and without START restrictions, and in light of the recent news about Russian ships being issued nuclear warheads, I would expect that every newly armed naval unit of significance is issued nuclear weapons. I would also expect nuclear-tipped cruise missiles to be available as armament for the strategic bomber fleet, and one must expect nuclear weapons to be flown routinely.

The total number of Russian strategic launchers would thus be estimated around 448 launch vehicles, most of which are MIRVed and carry a complement of 6-10 warheads – 2688 warheads at the minimum. The total number of tactical warheads that can be mounted on either the cruise missiles, hypersonic missiles, torpedoes and similar devices is much greater, but their utility is questionable since it would be expected that only a few of those would be launched before the need arises for the strategic ones.

As for the Americans, each of their bombers should be suspected of carrying a payload of nuclear-tipped cruise missiles. The same applies for their heavy drones. Each of their stealthy airplanes or heavy drones that approaches Russian borders should be suspected of attempting a clandestine decapitation strike.

 

Deadly skepticism

I noticed something in the recent weeks that attracted my attention. I’ll cite sources first:

“US believes Russia had failed intercontinental ballistic missile test around when Biden was in Ukraine” (CNN)

ACHTUNG: Former KGB Officer Tells German Newspaper That Russia No Longer Has Functional Nuclear Weapons (taken from Bild)

It’s not just those two, because I’ve seen this come up occasionally, but the frequency and focus seem to have increased recently.

You can probable derive correct conclusions – first, it’s complete nonsense because if there’s anything the Russians are prioritising, it’s their strategic nuclear arsenal. Everything else comes second, if even that. Also, it’s little known that the Russians are actually the greatest remaining source/producer of nuclear materials; the Americans became completely dependent on them for many radioactive isotopes. If anyone is in complete control of nuclear technology in all possible aspects at this time, it’s the Russians. The only nuclear warheads that aren’t maintained are those that are not deemed to show perspective within the scope of the nuclear weapons programme. Also, the launch vehicles have been tested, retested and tested again. The Russians have the rocket technology handled; they are about 20 years ahead of everybody else, and don’t even make me laugh with Space X. There’s that nonsense I hear almost every day when I search the web – the assumption that the Russians only have the old Soviet rusted-out crap they can neither understand nor repair anymore. If anything, this is the description of modern America, not Russia. The Russians renewed everything, it’s all brand new technology, and some of it is resurrection of advanced, never realized projects from the Soviet Union – they are in fact far more technologically advanced than the Soviet Union ever was. America, on the other hand, lost many of its capabilities over time and would have to re-invent it all from scratch. The issues they are having with their lunar space programme show that very clearly.

But why am I concerned over some Western idiots showing skepticism over the viability of the Russian nuclear weapons? It should be at the order of magnitude of the Moon landing denial, right? Yes, but with greater consequences. You see, if someone doubts we’ve been on the Moon, the consequences are limited. He’s an idiot, big deal. Same for thinking the Earth is flat. If someone doubts the viability of Russian nuclear weapons, he’s not scared of them, and can’t be persuaded of his error unless the weapons are used at such a massive and obvious scale that neither his opinion nor his life have any meaning at that point.

Let’s elaborate on this further. Let’s say the Russians want to demonstrate their weapons. They launch a rocket from Europe and put it through a basketball hoop in Kamchatka, like they usually do. The skeptic’s answer is that it’s all fake and propaganda, he doesn’t believe it, or it’s one success after a hundred failed attempts. In both cases, he remains inclined to kick the bear in the balls thinking he has no teeth or claws. Also, the skeptic doubts the viability of Russian warheads. The Russians make an underground test. The skeptic claims it’s fake propaganda, probably just an earthquake or one success after hundreds of failures. The Russians then make an atmospheric test. The skeptic says he doesn’t believe it, it’s all CGI, easy to do these days. End result, they keep fucking with the Russians until the Russians destroy their military and the cities, and the Americans have to retaliate; end of civilization as we know it.

I always knew skepticism was a form of mental illness, and I knew it was very dangerous to the spiritual state of the individual who succumbs to it, but it just might get everybody killed. There’s an even more pessimistic (and, unfortunately, also more likely) interpretation of this; the authors aren’t actually skeptical of Russian nukes, they just want to pacify the audience, so that they don’t worry or protest the glaringly obvious danger until it’s too late and the bastards paying them actually push the things over the red line of nuclear war.

 

A Chinese viewpoint

Two days ago the Chinese published their take on America, which might be an interesting read for those, Americans and otherwise, who think the rest of the world admires and envies America, and everybody is standing in line to get the American passport. I’m going to copy-paste the article in its entirety, because it’s too much fun for it ever to be lost behind some firewall:


US Hegemony and Its Perils

February 2023

Contents

Introduction

I. Political Hegemony—Throwing Its Weight Around

II. Military Hegemony—Wanton Use of Force

III. Economic Hegemony—Looting and Exploitation

IV. Technological Hegemony—Monopoly and Suppression

V. Cultural Hegemony—Spreading False Narratives

Conclusion

Introduction

Since becoming the world’s most powerful country after the two world wars and the Cold War, the United States has acted more boldly to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, pursue, maintain and abuse hegemony, advance subversion and infiltration, and willfully wage wars, bringing harm to the international community.

The United States has developed a hegemonic playbook to stage “color revolutions,” instigate regional disputes, and even directly launch wars under the guise of promoting democracy, freedom and human rights. Clinging to the Cold War mentality, the United States has ramped up bloc politics and stoked conflict and confrontation. It has overstretched the concept of national security, abused export controls and forced unilateral sanctions upon others. It has taken a selective approach to international law and rules, utilizing or discarding them as it sees fit, and has sought to impose rules that serve its own interests in the name of upholding a “rules-based international order.”

This report, by presenting the relevant facts, seeks to expose the U.S. abuse of hegemony in the political, military, economic, financial, technological and cultural fields, and to draw greater international attention to the perils of the U.S. practices to world peace and stability and the well-being of all peoples.

I. Political Hegemony — Throwing Its Weight Around

The United States has long been attempting to mold other countries and the world order with its own values and political system in the name of promoting democracy and human rights.

◆ Instances of U.S. interference in other countries’ internal affairs abound. In the name of “promoting democracy,” the United States practiced a “Neo-Monroe Doctrine” in Latin America, instigated “color revolutions” in Eurasia, and orchestrated the “Arab Spring” in West Asia and North Africa, bringing chaos and disaster to many countries.

In 1823, the United States announced the Monroe Doctrine. While touting an “America for the Americans,” what it truly wanted was an “America for the United States.”

Since then, the policies of successive U.S. governments toward Latin America and the Caribbean Region have been riddled with political interference, military intervention and regime subversion. From its 61-year hostility toward and blockade of Cuba to its overthrow of the Allende government of Chile, U.S. policy on this region has been built on one maxim-those who submit will prosper; those who resist shall perish.

The year 2003 marked the beginning of a succession of “color revolutions” — the “Rose Revolution” in Georgia, the “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine and the “Tulip Revolution” in Kyrgyzstan. The U.S. Department of State openly admitted playing a “central role” in these “regime changes.” The United States also interfered in the internal affairs of the Philippines, ousting President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. in 1986 and President Joseph Estrada in 2001 through the so-called “People Power Revolutions.”

In January 2023, former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo released his new book Never Give an Inch: Fighting for the America I Love. He revealed in it that the United States had plotted to intervene in Venezuela. The plan was to force the Maduro government to reach an agreement with the opposition, deprive Venezuela of its ability to sell oil and gold for foreign exchange, exert high pressure on its economy, and influence the 2018 presidential election.

◆ The U.S. exercises double standards on international rules. Placing its self-interest first, the United States has walked away from international treaties and organizations, and put its domestic law above international law. In April 2017, the Trump administration announced that it would cut off all U.S. funding to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) with the excuse that the organization “supports, or participates in the management of a programme of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.” The United States quit UNESCO twice in 1984 and 2017. In 2017, it announced leaving the Paris Agreement on climate change. In 2018, it announced its exit from the UN Human Rights Council, citing the organization’s “bias” against Israel and failure to protect human rights effectively. In 2019, the United States announced its withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty to seek unfettered development of advanced weapons. In 2020, it announced pulling out of the Treaty on Open Skies.

The United States has also been a stumbling block to biological arms control by opposing negotiations on a verification protocol for the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and impeding international verification of countries’ activities relating to biological weapons. As the only country in possession of a chemical weapons stockpile, the United States has repeatedly delayed the destruction of chemical weapons and remained reluctant in fulfilling its obligations. It has become the biggest obstacle to realizing “a world free of chemical weapons.”

◆ The United States is piecing together small blocs through its alliance system. It has been forcing an “Indo-Pacific Strategy” onto the Asia-Pacific region, assembling exclusive clubs like the Five Eyes, the Quad and AUKUS, and forcing regional countries to take sides. Such practices are essentially meant to create division in the region, stoke confrontation and undermine peace.

◆ The U.S. arbitrarily passes judgment on democracy in other countries, and fabricates a false narrative of “democracy versus authoritarianism” to incite estrangement, division, rivalry and confrontation. In December 2021, the United States hosted the first “Summit for Democracy,” which drew criticism and opposition from many countries for making a mockery of the spirit of democracy and dividing the world. In March 2023, the United States will host another “Summit for Democracy,” which remains unwelcome and will again find no support.

II. Military Hegemony — Wanton Use of Force

The history of the United States is characterized by violence and expansion. Since it gained independence in 1776, the United States has constantly sought expansion by force: it slaughtered Indians, invaded Canada, waged a war against Mexico, instigated the American-Spanish War, and annexed Hawaii. After World War II, the wars either provoked or launched by the United States included the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the War in Afghanistan, the Iraq War, the Libyan War and the Syrian War, abusing its military hegemony to pave the way for expansionist objectives. In recent years, the U.S. average annual military budget has exceeded 700 billion U.S. dollars, accounting for 40 percent of the world’s total, more than the 15 countries behind it combined. The United States has about 800 overseas military bases, with 173,000 troops deployed in 159 countries.

According to the book America Invades: How We’ve Invaded or been Militarily Involved with almost Every Country on Earth, the United States has fought or been militarily involved with almost all the 190-odd countries recognized by the United Nations with only three exceptions. The three countries were “spared” because the United States did not find them on the map.

◆ As former U.S. President Jimmy Carter put it, the United States is undoubtedly the most warlike nation in the history of the world. According to a Tufts University report, “Introducing the Military Intervention Project: A new Dataset on U.S. Military Interventions, 1776-2019,” the United States undertook nearly 400 military interventions globally between those years, 34 percent of which were in Latin America and the Caribbean, 23 percent in East Asia and the Pacific, 14 percent in the Middle East and North Africa, and 13 percent in Europe. Currently, its military intervention in the Middle East and North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa is on the rise.

Alex Lo, a South China Morning Post columnist, pointed out that the United States has rarely distinguished between diplomacy and war since its founding. It overthrew democratically elected governments in many developing countries in the 20th century and immediately replaced them with pro-American puppet regimes. Today, in Ukraine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Pakistan and Yemen, the United States is repeating its old tactics of waging proxy, low-intensity, and drone wars.

◆ U.S. military hegemony has caused humanitarian tragedies. Since 2001, the wars and military operations launched by the United States in the name of fighting terrorism have claimed over 900,000 lives with some 335,000 of them civilians, injured millions and displaced tens of millions. The 2003 Iraq War resulted in some 200,000 to 250,000 civilian deaths, including over 16,000 directly killed by the U.S. military, and left more than a million homeless.

The United States has created 37 million refugees around the world. Since 2012, the number of Syrian refugees alone has increased tenfold. Between 2016 and 2019, 33,584 civilian deaths were documented in the Syrian fightings, including 3,833 killed by U.S.-led coalition bombings, half of them women and children. The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) reported on 9 November 2018 that the air strikes launched by U.S. forces on Raqqa alone killed 1,600 Syrian civilians.

The two-decades-long war in Afghanistan devastated the country. A total of 47,000 Afghan civilians and 66,000 to 69,000 Afghan soldiers and police officers unrelated to the September 11 attacks were killed in U.S. military operations, and more than 10 million people were displaced. The war in Afghanistan destroyed the foundation of economic development there and plunged the Afghan people into destitution. After the “Kabul debacle” in 2021, the United States announced that it would freeze some 9.5 billion dollars in assets belonging to the Afghan central bank, a move considered as “pure looting.”

In September 2022, Turkish Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu commented at a rally that the United States has waged a proxy war in Syria, turned Afghanistan into an opium field and heroin factory, thrown Pakistan into turmoil, and left Libya in incessant civil unrest. The United States does whatever it takes to rob and enslave the people of any country with underground resources.

The United States has also adopted appalling methods in war. During the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the War in Afghanistan and the Iraq War, the United States used massive quantities of chemical and biological weapons as well as cluster bombs, fuel-air bombs, graphite bombs and depleted uranium bombs, causing enormous damage on civilian facilities, countless civilian casualties and lasting environmental pollution.

III. Economic Hegemony — Looting and Exploitation

After World War II, the United States led efforts to set up the Bretton Woods System, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, which, together with the Marshall Plan, formed the international monetary system centered around the U.S. dollar. In addition, the United States has also established institutional hegemony in the international economic and financial sector by manipulating the weighted voting systems, rules and arrangements of international organizations including “approval by 85 percent majority,” and its domestic trade laws and regulations. By taking advantage of the dollar’s status as the major international reserve currency, the United States is basically collecting “seigniorage” from around the world; and using its control over international organizations, it coerces other countries into serving America’s political and economic strategy.

◆ The United States exploits the world’s wealth with the help of “seigniorage.” It costs only about 17 cents to produce a 100 dollar bill, but other countries had to pony up 100 dollar of actual goods in order to obtain one. It was pointed out more than half a century ago, that the United States enjoyed exorbitant privilege and deficit without tears created by its dollar, and used the worthless paper note to plunder the resources and factories of other nations.

◆ The hegemony of U.S. dollar is the main source of instability and uncertainty in the world economy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States abused its global financial hegemony and injected trillions of dollars into the global market, leaving other countries, especially emerging economies, to pay the price. In 2022, the Fed ended its ultra-easy monetary policy and turned to aggressive interest rate hike, causing turmoil in the international financial market and substantial depreciation of other currencies such as the Euro, many of which dropped to a 20-year low. As a result, a large number of developing countries were challenged by high inflation, currency depreciation and capital outflows. This was exactly what Nixon’s secretary of the treasury John Connally once remarked, with self-satisfaction yet sharp precision, that “the dollar is our currency, but it is your problem.”

◆ With its control over international economic and financial organizations, the United States imposes additional conditions to their assistance to other countries. In order to reduce obstacles to U.S. capital inflow and speculation, the recipient countries are required to advance financial liberalization and open up financial markets so that their economic policies would fall in line with America’s strategy. According to the Review of International Political Economy, along with the 1,550 debt relief programs extended by the IMF to its 131 member countries from 1985 to 2014, as many as 55,465 additional political conditions had been attached.

◆ The United States willfully suppresses its opponents with economic coercion. In the 1980s, to eliminate the economic threat posed by Japan, and to control and use the latter in service of America’s strategic goal of confronting the Soviet Union and dominating the world, the United States leveraged its hegemonic financial power against Japan, and concluded the Plaza Accord. As a result, Yen was pushed up, and Japan was pressed to open up its financial market and reform its financial system. The Plaza Accord dealt a heavy blow to the growth momentum of the Japanese economy, leaving Japan to what was later called “three lost decades.”

◆ America’s economic and financial hegemony has become a geopolitical weapon. Doubling down on unilateral sanctions and “long-arm jurisdiction,” the United States has enacted such domestic laws as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, and the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, and introduced a series of executive orders to sanction specific countries, organizations or individuals. Statistics show that U.S. sanctions against foreign entities increased by 933 percent from 2000 to 2021. The Trump administration alone has imposed more than 3,900 sanctions, which means three sanctions per day. So far, the United States had or has imposed economic sanctions on nearly 40 countries across the world, including Cuba, China, Russia, the DPRK, Iran and Venezuela, affecting nearly half of the world’s population. “The United States of America” has turned itself into “the United States of Sanctions.” And “long-arm jurisdiction” has been reduced to nothing but a tool for the United States to use its means of state power to suppress economic competitors and interfere in normal international business. This is a serious departure from the principles of liberal market economy that the United States has long boasted.

IV. Technological Hegemony — Monopoly and Suppression

The United States seeks to deter other countries’ scientific, technological and economic development by wielding monopoly power, suppression measures and technology restrictions in high-tech fields.

◆ The United States monopolizes intellectual property in the name of protection. Taking advantage of the weak position of other countries, especially developing ones, on intellectual property rights and the institutional vacancy in relevant fields, the United States reaps excessive profits through monopoly. In 1994, the United States pushed forward the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), forcing the Americanized process and standards in intellectual property protection in an attempt to solidify its monopoly on technology.

In the 1980s, to contain the development of Japan’s semiconductor industry, the United States launched the “301” investigation, built bargaining power in bilateral negotiations through multilateral agreements, threatened to label Japan as conducting unfair trade, and imposed retaliatory tariffs, forcing Japan to sign the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. As a result, Japanese semiconductor enterprises were almost completely driven out of global competition, and their market share dropped from 50 percent to 10 percent. Meanwhile, with the support of the U.S. government, a large number of U.S. semiconductor enterprises took the opportunity and grabbed larger market share.

◆ The United States politicizes, weaponizes technological issues and uses them as ideological tools. Overstretching the concept of national security, the United States mobilized state power to suppress and sanction Chinese company Huawei, restricted the entry of Huawei products into the U.S. market, cut off its supply of chips and operating systems, and coerced other countries to ban Huawei from undertaking local 5G network construction. It even talked Canada into unwarrantedly detaining Huawei’s CFO Meng Wanzhou for nearly three years.

The United States has fabricated a slew of excuses to clamp down on China’s high-tech enterprises with global competitiveness, and has put more than 1,000 Chinese enterprises on sanction lists. In addition, the United States has also imposed controls on biotechnology, artificial intelligence and other high-end technologies, reinforced export restrictions, tightened investment screening, suppressed Chinese social media apps such as TikTok and WeChat, and lobbied the Netherlands and Japan to restrict exports of chips and related equipment or technology to China.

The United States has also practiced double standards in its policy on China-related technological professionals. To sideline and suppress Chinese researchers, since June 2018, visa validity has been shortened for Chinese students majoring in certain high-tech-related disciplines, repeated cases have occurred where Chinese scholars and students going to the United States for exchange programs and study were unjustifiably denied and harassed, and large-scale investigation on Chinese scholars working in the United States was carried out.

◆ The United States solidifies its technological monopoly in the name of protecting democracy. By building small blocs on technology such as the “chips alliance” and “clean network,” the United States has put “democracy” and “human rights” labels on high-technology, and turned technological issues into political and ideological issues, so as to fabricate excuses for its technological blockade against other countries. In May 2019, the United States enlisted 32 countries to the Prague 5G Security Conference in the Czech Republic and issued the Prague Proposal in an attempt to exclude China’s 5G products. In April 2020, then U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced the “5G clean path,” a plan designed to build technological alliance in the 5G field with partners bonded by their shared ideology on democracy and the need to protect “cyber security.” The measures, in essence, are the U.S. attempts to maintain its technological hegemony through technological alliances.

◆ The United States abuses its technological hegemony by carrying out cyber attacks and eavesdropping. The United States has long been notorious as an “empire of hackers,” blamed for its rampant acts of cyber theft around the world. It has all kinds of means to enforce pervasive cyber attacks and surveillance, including using analog base station signals to access mobile phones for data theft, manipulating mobile apps, infiltrating cloud servers, and stealing through undersea cables. The list goes on.

U.S. surveillance is indiscriminate. All can be targets of its surveillance, be they rivals or allies, even leaders of allied countries such as former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and several French Presidents. Cyber surveillance and attacks launched by the United States such as “Prism,” “Dirtbox,” “Irritant Horn” and “Telescreen Operation” are all proof that the United States is closely monitoring its allies and partners. Such eavesdropping on allies and partners has already caused worldwide outrage. Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, a website that has exposed U.S. surveillance programs, said that “do not expect a global surveillance superpower to act with honor or respect. There is only one rule: there are no rules.”

V. Cultural Hegemony — Spreading False Narratives

The global expansion of American culture is an important part of its external strategy. The United States has often used cultural tools to strengthen and maintain its hegemony in the world.

◆ The United States embeds American values in its products such as movies. American values and lifestyle are a tied product to its movies and TV shows, publications, media content, and programs by the government-funded non-profit cultural institutions. It thus shapes a cultural and public opinion space in which American culture reigns and maintains cultural hegemony. In his article The Americanization of the World, John Yemma, an American scholar, exposed the real weapons in U.S. cultural expansion: the Hollywood, the image design factories on Madison Avenue and the production lines of Mattel Company and Coca-Cola.

There are various vehicles the United States uses to keep its cultural hegemony. American movies are the most used; they now occupy more than 70 percent of the world’s market share. The United States skilfully exploits its cultural diversity to appeal to various ethnicities. When Hollywood movies descend on the world, they scream the American values tied to them.

◆ American cultural hegemony not only shows itself in “direct intervention,” but also in “media infiltration” and as “a trumpet for the world.” U.S.-dominated Western media has a particularly important role in shaping global public opinion in favor of U.S. meddling in the internal affairs of other countries.

The U.S. government strictly censors all social media companies and demands their obedience. Twitter CEO Elon Musk admitted on 27 December 2022 that all social media platforms work with the U.S. government to censor content, reported Fox Business Network. Public opinion in the United States is subject to government intervention to restrict all unfavorable remarks. Google often makes pages disappear.

U.S. Department of Defense manipulates social media. In December 2022, The Intercept, an independent U.S. investigative website, revealed that in July 2017, U.S. Central Command official Nathaniel Kahler instructed Twitter’s public policy team to augment the presence of 52 Arabic-language accounts on a list he sent, six of which were to be given priority. One of the six was dedicated to justifying U.S. drone attacks in Yemen, such as by claiming that the attacks were precise and killed only terrorists, not civilians. Following Kahler’s directive, Twitter put those Arabic-language accounts on a “white list” to amplify certain messages.

◆The United States practices double standards on the freedom of the press. It brutally suppresses and silences media of other countries by various means. The United States and Europe bar mainstream Russian media such as Russia Today and the Sputnik from their countries. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube openly restrict official accounts of Russia. Netflix, Apple and Google have removed Russian channels and applications from their services and app stores. Unprecedented draconian censorship is imposed on Russia-related contents.

◆The United States abuses its cultural hegemony to instigate “peaceful evolution” in socialist countries. It sets up news media and cultural outfits targeting socialist countries. It pours staggering amounts of public funds into radio and TV networks to support their ideological infiltration, and these mouthpieces bombard socialist countries in dozens of languages with inflammatory propaganda day and night.

The United States uses misinformation as a spear to attack other countries, and has built an industrial chain around it: there are groups and individuals making up stories, and peddling them worldwide to mislead public opinion with the support of nearly limitless financial resources.

Conclusion

While a just cause wins its champion wide support, an unjust one condemns its pursuer to be an outcast. The hegemonic, domineering, and bullying practices of using strength to intimidate the weak, taking from others by force and subterfuge, and playing zero-sum games are exerting grave harm. The historical trends of peace, development, cooperation, and mutual benefit are unstoppable. The United States has been overriding truth with its power and trampling justice to serve self-interest. These unilateral, egoistic and regressive hegemonic practices have drawn growing, intense criticism and opposition from the international community.

Countries need to respect each other and treat each other as equals. Big countries should behave in a manner befitting their status and take the lead in pursuing a new model of state-to-state relations featuring dialogue and partnership, not confrontation or alliance. China opposes all forms of hegemonism and power politics, and rejects interference in other countries’ internal affairs. The United States must conduct serious soul-searching. It must critically examine what it has done, let go of its arrogance and prejudice, and quit its hegemonic, domineering and bullying practices.

Putin’s speech

Let’s summarize Putin’s speech of today:

  • The West deceived and betrayed the Russians and they now see them for what they are: an implacable foe. (translation: we are in a new cold war)
  • The Russians are not at war with the Ukrainian people, who are victims and hostages of the West-sponsored evil Nazi horde. (translation: Ukraine will be liberated and given the option of joining the Russian Federation)
  • There is an information war against Russia, and all kinds of subversion and foreign agents will be dealt with. (translation: If you want to be pro-Western, Russia is not the place where this is an option. This is a war and siding with the enemy will not be tolerated.)
  • “The goal of the West is to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia, to end us once and for all. We will respond accordingly, because we are talking about the existence of our country.” (translation: this is the key wording that authorises use of nuclear weapons according to the Russian nuclear doctrine)
  • Military will become more meritocratic; the successful soldiers and officers will be promoted.
  • Those who proved their patriotism in war will be elevated to higher functions in Russia.
  • There will be a significant allocation of funds towards the social programmes directed at the families of military casualties.
  • The Russians who escaped to the West with their money, thinking the West is a “safe haven”, made their choice, and nobody in Russia cares about them now that the West betrayed and robbed them. Serve them right. (translation: “Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.” Mt 12:30)
  • The latest ground-based missile systems have been put on combat duty a week ago.
  • Russia suspends its participation in START. (translation: Sarmat is online and contains more hypersonic MIRV units than START would allow)
  • Russia is ready to suspend its participation in the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. (translation: the Americans are preparing low-yield nuke tests and this is the response)
  • Defence ministry and Rosatom must ensure readiness for nuclear weapons testing. (translation: you obviously need to learn that our nukes still work and that they are a thing that exists in order to be used)

This stops somewhat short of a declaration of war to the West, but we are now officially back in the cold war, and I don’t mean the détente, I mean the 1950s. No more “our Western partners”, no more trust. The key formulation that puts nukes on the table was used. All nuclear treaties are defunct.

Just a reminder

Andrew Tate and his brother are still in prison. The allegations against them are obviously false and their only purpose is to destroy their reputation. How do I know? I’ve seen videos by several women who are supposed to be the “victims”, who are trying to submit statements that they are not victims and there in fact was no crime committed whatsoever. The legal system simply refused to accept their statements, and I think even their videos where they are trying to be heard and defend their friends are being suppressed by the American-controlled censorship machine. This makes it obvious that there’s nothing to the allegations, it’s all falsehood.

Still, those men are still in prison, like Julian Assange.

Their imprisonment, however, is only a degree worse than ours. We are all on enemy-controlled territory. The “laws” are just a fig leaf over the truth of brute force and evil. Only God can save us.