A Turkish politician recently made a speech praising Hitler for killing Jews, I quote:
A local politician from Türkiye’s Justice and Development Party (AK Party) has publicly praised Adolf Hitler’s genocide of the Jews, adding that he was “praying” for the Nazi leader.
Suleyman Sezen, who represents President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s party in the Atakum district council in the province of Samsun, made the comments at a meeting on Wednesday.
“Hitler had this remark, ‘You will curse me for every Jew that I did not kill.’ Such true words, as Zionist Jewish Israel today is behind every single attempt at creating chaos in the world,” the politician declared in a rant shared online. He added that he prayed for “God’s mercy and grace on [Hitler] for his words.”
Sezen expressed hope that Israel “will soon cease to exist and there will be peace in the world once it is cleansed of Jews.”
There has been lots of similar sentiment expressed lately, and a very concerted, regimented response of Muslims all over the world, which makes me think people are not perceiving the actual threat here. Also, I see there is a “factory” of false news in Palestine, that’s not being properly verified as it is re-published verbatim worldwide, which is quite similar to the situation in Ukraine, where the Ukrainian sources routinely create falsehoods that are then re-published and amplified elsewhere, creating a completely wrong impression about the reality of the situation. For instance, in the “news” about the Israeli strike on the hospital in Gaza, nobody really verified the number of people killed, and the number of 500 seems to be repeated without any verification, and I’ve seen EU sources mention the actual number of killed being in the order of 10-50.
With all this Muslim anti-Jewish sentiment being revealed, it is quite obvious that the Jews will conclude that the Muslims are in essence an implacable foe that needs to be completely defeated in order for any kind of permanent peace to be possible, and also that the Western “human rights” sentiment is making the West a serious obstacle to their long-term survival. This is nothing new, and I talked about this years ago, but this is now obvious enough for the non-Israelis to notice.
So, considering how the Muslims obviously act as a singular political entity worldwide, how Muslim immigration in the West is obviously a “fifth column” that just waits for the signal to overthrow the native Europeans, and considering how the Western concept of human rights and individualism makes it impossible to handle such threats in an appropriate manner, and in fact actively obstructs Israel in its attempts to properly handle the issue, it is not difficult to understand that Israel might resort to desperate actions in order to try to assure its survival, although I honestly don’t see what they could do in this situation that would not also result in the destruction of Israel.
The fact the Muslims managed to re-brand themselves as victims in order to weaponise Western idiocy for their purposes is as incredible as it is ominous.
I don’t cheer for either side here, but I do cheer for escalation. When it comes to WWIII trigger, my bet was not on Ukraine or Taiwan, but on Israel. One way or another. And here we are now. Hopefully the Book of Revelation won’t disappoint me. 😉
In the case of Ukraine and Taiwan at least one side doesn’t want escalation. When it comes to Israel and Palestine, both sides want escalation. Additionally, America is behind Israel, and it wants escalation. Likewise, Muslim countries that stand behind Palestine also want escalation. Considering that Israel and America can’t win a conventional war, they will have to resort to nukes. Which Pakistan also has. This could lead to chain reaction with unknown consequences.
That being said, I want to make it clear that I don’t concern myself with the lives of Muslims. And as for Israeli-Arab conflicts, I find them as boring as Indo-Pakistani ones, and pay minimum attention to all that. Neither of these conflicts are solvable, IMO, because of the mentality of both sides. That is to say, to solve the conflict one side or another, or both, would have to be eliminated.
I avoided commenting on this conflict but I do now want to state the following:
– As far as I can tell (and I use this disclaimer because, as I said, I didn’t follow closely Israeli-Arab conflicts), both sides have been sabotaging the peace process.
First of all, Israelis were the ones who arrived, declared the existence of their state, and proceeded with ethnic cleansing. No one in the world would react to that with “oh no problem, cleanse as much of the region as you want and then let’s have peace”.
Second, Israel is highly unlikely to, in foreseeable future, accept the current borders of Israel. Even if we count Palestine as Israel (which in itself is disputed). That is because Israel currently occupies Golan Heights. They consider this strategically important because of water control.
Third, if Israel accepts peace now, in the future it will find itself in a vastly inferior military and economic situation. Muslim countries are growing, whereas Israel is facing headwinds. Israeli strategic situation is dire, and Israel has to act now, much like America. If Israel accepted peace now, in the future it would be at the mercy of Muslim countries who could, at the time of their choosing, declare that previous peace treaty was unequal, signed when America and Israel were at the height of their power, and thus obligations of Muslim countries are void. Therefore, Israel can only pretend to seek peace, while planning the Final Solution.
– I am curious about the logic, principles, ideology, and ethics of the creation of the state of Israel in the 20th century. To be clear – I have no problem with the existence of Israel. I do have a problem with double standards. If Native Americans can’t get a state the size of Vatican City, the justification for the creation of Israel looks to me like “rules-based order”, that is to say, Westerners conjure whatever rule is currently useful to them, and apply it selectively. Since Jews didn’t have their own state for two millennia, there is obviously no statute of limitations. Does that mean that ethnicities can go back to the territory they occupied 2000 years ago and ethnically cleanse whoever is there? Or does that only apply if a group occupying such a territory is significantly inferior in morality (which is not a principle that I am against)? Whatever the justification may be, is it acceptable to Westerners that the very same justification is used in other cases, especially those that would be at their own expense? I doubt it.
– If there is a factory of false news in Palestine, the Jewish factory of false news is on a planetary scale. Regarding the specific example of that hospital in Gaza, from what I’ve seen on Telegram Israelis showed image from 2022 claiming Hamas bombed it, and they also presented alleged audio conversation of Hamas which supposedly proves some Hamas rocket misfired and went straight for the hospital and burst just like JDAM. It’s indeed Ukraine level stuff, but it’s the Israelis producing that kind of fake news. Palestinians do the old-fashioned non-technical inflation of numbers. Moreover, at least from what I’ve briefly seen, the behavior of Israel prior to and during the Hamas intrusion is reminiscent of 9/11 and Pearl Harbor.
– Israel is not against “human rights”. In fact, Israel is among the countries that signed a joint statement condemning China for made-up violations of “human rights”, which in itself are made-up. China dealt with its own issue of Muslim terrorism in the mildest possible way. You’d think that Israel, a country with experience of Muslim terrorism, would be sympathetic to China, and if anything would criticize China for being too lenient. But no. Israel has no problem with ethnic cleansing, no problem with razing Gaza to the ground and indiscriminately killing people, no problem destroying Muslim countries using America as a tool, and soon probably no problem with nuking Muslim countries. But supporting the Muslims in China, lying for them and manufacturing pro-Muslim fake news, that’s all fine as long as it serves geopolitical interests. Only Muslims who are a threat to Israel are a problem. If they are useful they’re supposedly fine.
It’s not that there are so many antisemites in the world. It’s that many people perceive the ongoing conflict as unjust. And it’s not difficult to see why. Rules that apply to America and Israel don’t apply to the rest of the world. Another problem is that a significant portion of the world population subscribes to the notion of equality, which means that they consider each Muslim life to be worth as much as anyone else’s.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4idQbwsvtUo
I am tempted to say the same, but I’m not sure it’s true. I cheer for the possibility of conditions being met for my imprisonment here to end. I don’t cheer for the kind of an end that would create hellish conditions and increase suffering of the beings trapped here. I wish something much better was God’s plan, something that would make the end quick and end this entire bullshit once and for all. That’s what I hope for.
Yes, Muslims definitely managed to re-brand themselves as victims and that shows how Westerners managed to become idiots forgetting how they were harassed for thousand years, ever since Islam was born. On the other side Jews dislike that for the simplest reason ever … they don’t like the competetion and like to have sole right on martyrdom and cry “Antisemitism! Antisemitism!” whenever the Holocaust is subjected to any kind of debate or intelectual scrutiny, if someone does that it wouldn’t take long before not just Germans, but all Westerners would come up with the idea Jews have been overdue for a long time milking them with the notion of a guilt trip they instilled in them.