The main-stream media presented us with the “scientific facts”, in form of the polls showing how Donald Trump lags significantly behind Hillary Clinton and has no chance of winning the elections. They laughed at anyone questioning the scientific accuracy and validity of those polls. They presented themselves as someone who speaks from the position of science, truth, evidence and reason.
All of that proved to be bullshit and propaganda. The polls were intentionally cooked up by oversampling Democrats, by intentionally oversampling target groups that were more likely to vote for Clinton, basically, they started with the desired result and cooked up a scientifically-sounding brew of horse shit.
But stay assured that every other thing they have been telling you is spot on, like the global warming, which is so incredibly discredited that its advocates are using progressively stronger magnifying glass to find any sign of the supposed climate change, at the times where the original theory predicted that all coastal areas of the world should have been under water already. God fucking damn it, even Venice, which is built on water, still exists. Krapanj island in Croatia, whose highest point above sea level is 1.25 meters, is still completely untouched by the supposedly rampant sea level rise. We have more green areas in the previously arid parts of the world (because CO2 is plant food, and the plants immediately responded with accelerated growth in response to its increased availability), so no desertification, and no climate-caused exodus from the endangered areas. Antarctic ice cap is actually showing the overall increase. Arctic ice cap is also increasing in the recent years. Analysis of data from the NASA satellites shows no reduction in polar ice since they started recording the data in 1979.
It’s all horse shit, the entire supposed science behind the global warming theory. The scientific part was extremely poorly done, doesn’t hold up to even the slightest scrutiny and I lost all confidence in it a decade ago, when the predictions started to prove false.
But yeah, President Trump is a joke and climate change is gospel. Believe in it in order to get more likes on Facefuck and have more hip friends who fucking love science, bitch.
Because education, and shit.
Would you be willing to write an introductory/summary article about Sanat Kumar’s agenda, your work against him and his downfall? You’ve written so many articles over the years, many of them in Croatian, that it’s very easy for a new reader to get completely lost in the volume. At this level there should be a wikipedia devoted to your writing alone, and the way you’ve progressively changed your views as you uncovered deeper layers of truth. There is no jump-off point like a wiki article where one could start in general terms, to continue on and deepen their knowledge.
I understand you might be adverse to the idea, and I apologize – you’ve already written so much. I’m not trying to promote laziness, just… clarity, I guess. Just imagine someone jumping into your article base and trying to find out the general idea. It’s not easy, I’ve tried.
Of course, you’ve written about all this in depth in the two latest books. And anyone who’s too lazy to read them, doesn’t deserve it all served on a platter. I don’t know. I thought it might be useful, but of course you’ll know best.
It’s an interesting idea. I was thinking about something similar recently, about how my oldest book reflects thinking that I abandoned later, on many fronts, but I chose not to redact anything and instead leave it as-is, to show how my thinking evolved over the decades. I want it to be obvious that I didn’t just get it all at once. I really had to work for it.
However, regarding Sanat Kumar, the things are kind of sensitive, on several fronts. Until it’s all over, I do acknowledge the possibility of failure, and I don’t believe in premature celebrations. There’s bad shit still going on, and I cannot eliminate the possibility of everything going south, either due to some fault on my side of things, or something unpredictable taking place, or me simply dying due to exhaustion, or going mad due to continuous pressure. I would consider it a bad omen to write about it now, in a positive tone. There will be ample opportunities for that if I succeed. If I don’t, I’ll be buried in an unmarked grave, as Korolev used to say.
Also, it’s difficult for me to make things any clearer than I already have, because in order to write about those things, I need to invent a language for communicating ideas that aren’t really verbal; sometimes something might sound contradictory to an audience, and the cause of contradiction is a misapprehension regarding the way those things work. So, if I sometimes feel reluctant about writing certain things down, it’s because I anticipate it would do more harm than good, because I would be mired in attempts to explain something that’s inherently fucked up.
There’s another reason for my reluctance, and that is the fact that most of the “missing” parts are private. There are things I was told that I refuse to share with others.
Also, I am intentionally cryptic sometimes because I have enemies. I do not want to help them in their efforts to oppose or harm me. So, things will have to remain as they are for the time being, and any Wikipedia that is to log my efforts will have to be astral. 🙂
Thank you for replying, it makes a lot of sense. Some of these reasons did occur to me. As for SK, I have a strong sense that you will succeed, but your caution is very admirable.
What is the reason behind pushing idea of global warming? I read your articles about Earth actually cooling and I see nothing “dangerous” in pushing that idea in media instead of global warming.
Oil supply peaked in 2008. This was tested by artificially pumping up demand, and forcing all sources of supply to max out, even to the level that could endanger the wells. After that was established, the demand-side of economy was artificially compromised, forcing a cool-down period, accompanied by strong propaganda efforts with the goal of weaning people off oil – the global warming and making “carbon” a bad word was a means to this end. Also, fake supply was generated (fracking and oil shales) in order to calm down fears regarding peak oil.
So essentially, there is no global warming and there is no CO2 problem, but barring that, who would explain the masses why they should migrate from oil while it’s supposedly abundant? And when they figure out how scarce it actually is, it will be too late and the sudden cut-off of supply and price hikes would destroy the economy.
Well about the sea level rising, it sure seems like bullshit. My mother-in-law was born on Krapanj, she even has a small house there, and I was just talking to my father-in-law, and he said that for the past 40 years sea level hasn’t risen for a centimeter. If anything, he remembers high tide used to flood the waterline before, and for the past 20 years not once 🙂
So yeah, look out for the flood 😉
The first time I came to Hvar with my parents was somewhere in 1984, and I remember the exact position of certain rocks there; there was no sea level rise. None whatsoever, zero millimeters. So yeah, those communist assholes can come with a microscope and try to find something that’s fucked up, but the reality is that their predictions were all catastrophic on a macro level, like, only the torch of the Statue of Liberty protruding above water, that kind of a level. Polar bears drowning because of melting ice, and that kind of bullshit.
What am I doing about global warming? I’m going to use up as much carbon as I can, because I’m useful and I’m doing good things with it. The communists who think they are using up too much resources are in fact right, and should proceed to save the world by killing themselves because they are fucking useless.
Yup, I remember same things from Vis island when I was a kid, same stuff.
I also remember the hype about global warming in the 80’s, there was a movie (can’t remember the name) and what horrible predictions they made there. Basically by the year 2005 all the coastal cities should have been flooded, the air was supposed to be so polluted we would need gas masks to go out, and the society would collapse in post apocalyptic scenario.
And all of that was supposed to happen 10 years ago, hmm… 😉
Yeah, and in reality the arid areas of the world are now greener because the plants love CO2.