I was thinking about the extent to which past trauma and frustrations condition my actions, and whether that is something that should be remedied, or accepted.
You see, people usually assume that conditioning by trauma is a bad thing, but if you know anything about how neural networks are trained, you would know that trauma is an excellent way to condition a neural network to avoid a certain path. For instance, fall from great height is deadly. In order to avoid death, it would be a good idea to condition oneself to avoid situations that can lead to fall from height. In case of humans, it’s an instinct, hard-wired in our brains from the beginning, as something that is always necessary. Don’t fuck around at heights. Don’t eat foods you never ate before if you’re lost in the woods. Be afraid of the dark. Basically, try to survive long enough that your conscious mind can guide you, but before that, rely on instinct. Also, if you barely survived something, it creates a strong trauma-imprint in order for you to avoid things that might bring you close to such a near-miss in the future. You can see where I’m going there – fear and trauma can be a very good way not to get poisoned, raped, robbed or killed. It’s much safer for you to be afraid of snakes and spiders, than to handle them. The worst thing that can happen to you if you fear them is fear. The worst thing that can happen if you don’t fear them is death. From the evolution standpoint, fear is preferable, and trauma is a way to store personal experience in actionable, useful form – if you hit your toe on a rock once and broke it, trauma-caused imprint will make you careful about it in the future. If you got raped in a corn field once because you weren’t afraid to walk alone in the dark through desolate places, trauma will change your dangerous behaviour in a hurry.
The problem is neither fear nor trauma – rather, the problem are all those “positive thinking” nonsense books from America, authored in the 1990s or earlier, where fear, stress or trauma are seen as a philosophical substitute for evil in a worldview that tries very hard to avoid evil as a concept. They thought that, if you removed all trauma-imprints, you will psychologically return to the innocence of childhood which they for some reason see as perfection. I don’t share that opinion, because you know what the difference is between a child and an idiot? A child is younger; that’s all. I don’t wish to be an idiot again, because I worked quite hard to learn what I have, and if I have scars from trauma, they all contain a lesson – if you do this, you might get wrecked again.
Sure, sometimes trauma generalises things too much, to the point where very specific bad experience can “poison the well” in a very broad way that isn’t really helpful – for instance, you get scared of heights even when it’s pointless and not at all useful. Such things need to be worked on, of course, but if I have traumatic experiences caused by a computer that ran a shitty Win98 OS with too little RAM, and repeatedly froze and crashed when I tried to edit a 300DPI TIFF image for the cover of my first book, and as a result I couldn’t finish the edit in time and I ended up submitting the version that’s not properly sized and text ended up being too close to the margins, and so on? What if those traumatic experiences cause me to over-specify my computers in order to avoid situations of this kind, where the computer runs perfectly fine 99% of the time, but when I need to do some graphics work, it turns out to be unfit and causes me to fail at important tasks? What’s the worst thing that can happen if I listen to my experience and buy over-specced equipment whenever I can? I can waste some money, and that’s it. For 99% of the time, I will have a computer that’s vastly over-specified for the task at hand, but at that instance when I need to prepare a meter-sized high-res photographic print, I will be able to do it without a problem. Also, with cars – I have trauma caused by cars with insufficiently powerful engines, because my first car had 54HP and overtaking was always scary and dangerous. I also have issues with bad tyres. As a result, I avoid cars that are underpowered or in some other way unsafe, and I try to always have excellent tyres. Again, what exactly is the problem with trauma here? It causes me to spend more money on really important things that prevent dangerous situations? How terrible. 🙂 I also have trauma caused by food poisoning that makes me wary of things that caused food poisoning before – that jar of pickled olives with only a few remaining ones that’s been sitting in the fridge, or that opened cup of sour cream that’s been in the fridge for a week, especially in the summer, and stuff that tastes a bit “off” – what’s the worst that can happen if I “succumb to my fears”? I throw away suspicious foods and not get sick? That’s terrible, I must immediately return to childhood where I had no such fears and would eat any kind of toxic garbage including leaked batteries and dog shit. What an ideal state of spiritual perfection that was. 🙂
In short, we’ve all been told all kinds of stupid bullshit, and we need to un-learn it all, especially the stuff that came from America, because that’s simply a motherlode of nonsense.
Trauma by definition causes dysfunction. If a person has gone through hardship and learned from it, that’s a life lesson, not trauma.
This is trauma: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7Jll9_EiyA
No, that’s brain damage. Trauma can occur in a very wide range, from bullet through the brain to hammer impact to the finger. Sure, a wide range of trauma causes permanent injury or death, however I was more reasonable with my definition, and constrained it to very unpleasant learning experiences.
Of course it’s brain damage. However, he did not get this damage through physical means, like a piece of shrapnel or bullet lodged in his brain. He got it from the daily stresses of WWI trench warfare. The effect on his psyche damaged his physical body.
What is his unpleasant learning experience? Don’t get conscripted into war? What should a holocaust survivor learn from his traumatic experience?
Trauma is not an inconvenience but a disabling, incapacitating effect on the psyche. It causes inability to do the things one was able to do before the trauma. Until it is healed, if that is possible.
In the end, the one lesson to learn from such trauma is “don’t be born in this world.” But until that’s possible one has to function.
No, you’re wrong, it’s concussive brain damage, physical injury from the blast. It’s a known thing in warfare. Though history, the explanations varied between psychological and physical causes, but today it’s well explained.
https://www.flintrehab.com/blast-induced-traumatic-brain-injury/
That’s interesting, I didn’t know that. It makes sense, with how physical the symptoms are.
However, it doesn’t erase the existence of purely psychological trauma. It can even propagate generationally through epigenetic changes.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24029109/
Honestly, I can imagine many good uses for psychological trauma. For instance, anyone who thinks that women are cute and harmless should have to experience a childhood with my mother, and is guaranteed never to suffer from such delusions again.
Do you want to say that death makes some big difference in the conclusions one would draw from one’s experience, or that there’s nothing after it? Of course a holocaust survivor or a victim could draw many conclusions from the experience, for instance that this world is not a good place created by a good God who is your mommy, and that humans are not by their nature good. The lesson might be that this place is genuinely nasty, and that, for instance, sane response to trouble is to GTFO, instead of thinking that all will be well if only you think positive.