Autor: Danijel Turina Datum: 2010-04-05 19:19:47 Grupe: hr.soc.religija Tema: Malo objektivnije o Steineru Linija: 122 Message-ID: hpd63j$9rv$1@ss408.t-com.hr |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 http://www.kheper.net/topics/Anthroposophy/Steiner.htm > Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925) is an important occult philosopher. An > Austrian, he was greatly influenced by Goethe's works, and worked for > a time at the Goethe archives at Weimer. He later became involved in > the Theosophical Society, and founded a new German branch. But > although obviously influenced by the Theosophical World-view (the > concept of seven planes, cosmic cycles and sub-cycles, etc) Steiner's > approach and teachings differed markedly from those of the rest of > Theosophists. Whereas the Theosophists, under the inspiration of > Blavatsky's orientation, looked to the East - to India and Tibet, for > inspiration - Steiner was preiminantly a European mystic. He was > interested in European occultism, European mysticism, European > Christianity. In 1907 he was initiated into the Rosicrucians. By > 1910 he was lecturing heavily on the Gospels, which gave him a > popular following among the Germans he associated with. > > Annie Besant and C. W. Leadbeater's Star of the East project (in > which they claimed the new Messiah had incarnated in the person of > Jiddu Krishnamurti, then a young boy) was as much as Steiner and the > Germans could bear. And the last thing the German aristrocracy > wanted to be associated with was the British empire and all that > Indian stuff. They craved instead the Nordic mysteries. > > Eventually, due to increasing tension with Annie Besant's brand of > Theosophy, things came to a head, and he broke away in 1913 to found > his own organisation, which he called Anthroposophy ("Wisdom of or > about Man"). > > Steiner wrote only a few books, but during his period as a teacher he > gave thousands of lectures on all aspects of occultism and > esotericism, as well as education, music, agriculture, and economics. > In this enormous corpus of work he laid out his metaphysical system, > a unique but limited structure, based on elements of Theosophy, > Rosicrucianism, Plato, Goethe, and Christianity. Indian influence in > his ideas was for all intents and purposes nil, unlike the > Theosophists, and the Theosophical Sanskrit terminology which appears > in his early lectures was soon replaced by Christian European terms, > such as spirit, soul, etc. > > Steiner claimed to have clairvoyant or occult vision; to be able to > directly perceive occult realities, spiritual beings, and the > Theosophists' Akashic Record. It was on the basis of reading this > akashic record that Steiner developed his cosmology, theory of human > evolution, Christology, etc. He claimed to be able to actually see > back in time to these ancient events imprinted on the cosmic aether. > > Unfortunately, this akashic record cannot have been the most reliable > thing, for Steiner made a few curious blunders. His account of the > formation and history of the Earth for example is not supported by > any astrophysical, geological, or paleontological evidence. He took > the Gospels at face value, whereas any modern religious historian > could tell you they were not eye-witness statements but theological > accounts of how the early Church perceived Christ, only written some > decades after the latter's death, and compiled from different > sources. And his claim (on the basis of this same akashic record) > that the anonymous fifth/sixth century Christian Neoplatonist who > used as a psuedonym the name of a disciple of Paul's was actually the > original (1st century) Dionysius mentioned in the book of Acts, is > disproved by the striking similarity between "Psuedo"-Dionysius' > writings and those of the Neoplatonist Proclus (fifth century). Whole > sections of Dionysius are in fact plagiarised from Proclus. > > Steiner's published lectures, despite being a mine of occult > information, are also tedious and repititious. His actual writings, > especially his later and more important ones, are even more so, and > for the most part totally unreadible. > > Steiner's current legacy lies in education and agriculture. His > education philosophy made him a notable figure among progressive > educators just after the First World War, and his "Waldorf schools" > are still known and respected by many today (although quite > understandably everyone tends to look down on his associated > cosmology in a rather dismissive way). In the 1940's and '50's in > Australia at least the Steiner people developed the Camp Hill > Communities (for example Warranala in Sydney), with curitative > education of other retarded children. In many ways these were the > forerunners of the modern communes, with aspects of closed monastic > communities. > > Steiner's extraordinary system of agriculture, called bio-dynamics, > rejects chemical fertilisers, and is based on the subtle formative > forces of plant growth. With the help of his second wife, Marie von > Sivers, he developed a system of flowing movement, "eurythmy", which > seems, especially in Curative Erythmy to be at least superficially > camparable to Chinese disciplines such as Tai Chi, although totally > independent of them (for Steiner the Greek influence was always > primary). > > Around the turn of the century, Steiner returned to the mystical > interests which had formed part of his education at Vienna. Such > occult interests tended to be quite common among the idealistic and > reforming circles in which Steiner moved, and his conversion from > Goethe-specialist to occult teacher was complete by about 1906. This > period was marked by the increasing ascendancy of Marie von Sivers > (1867-1948), a Baltic Russian actress and originally a keen > Theosophist. > > In 1906 Steiner accepted a charter from the O.T.O. (this was still > several years before Crowley was to join and eventually take over the > organisation), which licensed him to work as head of a lodge called > the Mysteria Mystica Aeterna. It is very unlikely that Steiner > adopted the sex-magical practices of that organization. Rather, he > was looking for an "apostolic succession" to give authority to his > own ideas and his own form of Rosicrucianism. But Steiner's > "Rosicrucianism", like his "theosophy", was a personal creation. He > mingled Theosophical ideas of karma and reincarnation with > contemporary European occultism, Goethe, and his own brand of > Christianity. - -- http://www.danijel.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREKAAYFAku6G7MACgkQU8G6/NHezOc9pQCfWqKIaDHL9UvGBt4nExsvm/qH iJAAoO45JCfZLLF3XurX05Fg9uCRjeAo =34zr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |