| Autor: Danijel Turina Datum: 2010-04-05 19:19:47 Grupe: hr.soc.religija Tema: Malo objektivnije o Steineru Linija: 122 Message-ID: hpd63j$9rv$1@ss408.t-com.hr |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
http://www.kheper.net/topics/Anthroposophy/Steiner.htm
> Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925) is an important occult philosopher. An
> Austrian, he was greatly influenced by Goethe's works, and worked for
> a time at the Goethe archives at Weimer. He later became involved in
> the Theosophical Society, and founded a new German branch. But
> although obviously influenced by the Theosophical World-view (the
> concept of seven planes, cosmic cycles and sub-cycles, etc) Steiner's
> approach and teachings differed markedly from those of the rest of
> Theosophists. Whereas the Theosophists, under the inspiration of
> Blavatsky's orientation, looked to the East - to India and Tibet, for
> inspiration - Steiner was preiminantly a European mystic. He was
> interested in European occultism, European mysticism, European
> Christianity. In 1907 he was initiated into the Rosicrucians. By
> 1910 he was lecturing heavily on the Gospels, which gave him a
> popular following among the Germans he associated with.
>
> Annie Besant and C. W. Leadbeater's Star of the East project (in
> which they claimed the new Messiah had incarnated in the person of
> Jiddu Krishnamurti, then a young boy) was as much as Steiner and the
> Germans could bear. And the last thing the German aristrocracy
> wanted to be associated with was the British empire and all that
> Indian stuff. They craved instead the Nordic mysteries.
>
> Eventually, due to increasing tension with Annie Besant's brand of
> Theosophy, things came to a head, and he broke away in 1913 to found
> his own organisation, which he called Anthroposophy ("Wisdom of or
> about Man").
>
> Steiner wrote only a few books, but during his period as a teacher he
> gave thousands of lectures on all aspects of occultism and
> esotericism, as well as education, music, agriculture, and economics.
> In this enormous corpus of work he laid out his metaphysical system,
> a unique but limited structure, based on elements of Theosophy,
> Rosicrucianism, Plato, Goethe, and Christianity. Indian influence in
> his ideas was for all intents and purposes nil, unlike the
> Theosophists, and the Theosophical Sanskrit terminology which appears
> in his early lectures was soon replaced by Christian European terms,
> such as spirit, soul, etc.
>
> Steiner claimed to have clairvoyant or occult vision; to be able to
> directly perceive occult realities, spiritual beings, and the
> Theosophists' Akashic Record. It was on the basis of reading this
> akashic record that Steiner developed his cosmology, theory of human
> evolution, Christology, etc. He claimed to be able to actually see
> back in time to these ancient events imprinted on the cosmic aether.
>
> Unfortunately, this akashic record cannot have been the most reliable
> thing, for Steiner made a few curious blunders. His account of the
> formation and history of the Earth for example is not supported by
> any astrophysical, geological, or paleontological evidence. He took
> the Gospels at face value, whereas any modern religious historian
> could tell you they were not eye-witness statements but theological
> accounts of how the early Church perceived Christ, only written some
> decades after the latter's death, and compiled from different
> sources. And his claim (on the basis of this same akashic record)
> that the anonymous fifth/sixth century Christian Neoplatonist who
> used as a psuedonym the name of a disciple of Paul's was actually the
> original (1st century) Dionysius mentioned in the book of Acts, is
> disproved by the striking similarity between "Psuedo"-Dionysius'
> writings and those of the Neoplatonist Proclus (fifth century). Whole
> sections of Dionysius are in fact plagiarised from Proclus.
>
> Steiner's published lectures, despite being a mine of occult
> information, are also tedious and repititious. His actual writings,
> especially his later and more important ones, are even more so, and
> for the most part totally unreadible.
>
> Steiner's current legacy lies in education and agriculture. His
> education philosophy made him a notable figure among progressive
> educators just after the First World War, and his "Waldorf schools"
> are still known and respected by many today (although quite
> understandably everyone tends to look down on his associated
> cosmology in a rather dismissive way). In the 1940's and '50's in
> Australia at least the Steiner people developed the Camp Hill
> Communities (for example Warranala in Sydney), with curitative
> education of other retarded children. In many ways these were the
> forerunners of the modern communes, with aspects of closed monastic
> communities.
>
> Steiner's extraordinary system of agriculture, called bio-dynamics,
> rejects chemical fertilisers, and is based on the subtle formative
> forces of plant growth. With the help of his second wife, Marie von
> Sivers, he developed a system of flowing movement, "eurythmy", which
> seems, especially in Curative Erythmy to be at least superficially
> camparable to Chinese disciplines such as Tai Chi, although totally
> independent of them (for Steiner the Greek influence was always
> primary).
>
> Around the turn of the century, Steiner returned to the mystical
> interests which had formed part of his education at Vienna. Such
> occult interests tended to be quite common among the idealistic and
> reforming circles in which Steiner moved, and his conversion from
> Goethe-specialist to occult teacher was complete by about 1906. This
> period was marked by the increasing ascendancy of Marie von Sivers
> (1867-1948), a Baltic Russian actress and originally a keen
> Theosophist.
>
> In 1906 Steiner accepted a charter from the O.T.O. (this was still
> several years before Crowley was to join and eventually take over the
> organisation), which licensed him to work as head of a lodge called
> the Mysteria Mystica Aeterna. It is very unlikely that Steiner
> adopted the sex-magical practices of that organization. Rather, he
> was looking for an "apostolic succession" to give authority to his
> own ideas and his own form of Rosicrucianism. But Steiner's
> "Rosicrucianism", like his "theosophy", was a personal creation. He
> mingled Theosophical ideas of karma and reincarnation with
> contemporary European occultism, Goethe, and his own brand of
> Christianity.
- --
http://www.danijel.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAku6G7MACgkQU8G6/NHezOc9pQCfWqKIaDHL9UvGBt4nExsvm/qH
iJAAoO45JCfZLLF3XurX05Fg9uCRjeAo
=34zr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|