-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Branimir Maksimovic wrote:
> to the innate conceptual nature of Magic. In this he was following in
> the foot steps of Annie Besant and Bishop Leadbeater who had already
> succeeded in corrupting Blavatskian Theosophy, trans-forming it into a
> Christian occultism with Eastern overtones. Though Steiner was in
> conflict with them, nonetheless their doctrines must have affected him profoundly,
> despite his so called clairvoyance being in opposition to the
> so-called clairvoyance of Leadbeater.
> While this was going on Waite who had been raised as a Roman Catholic
> seemed determined to follow in the footsteps of the above named
> teachers. After the revolt of 1900 in the Order he was one of the
> several committee members who ran the Order. Later he pulled out from
> this committee to form his own Fellowship of The Rosy Cross. When this
> happened he totally revised not merely the rituals of the Order but the
> entire philosophic context of the Order. In this volume three of his
> Rituals are included. From them the discriminating reader will be able
> to determine to what extent this perversion of the Order methodology
> had advanced. There is almost no relationship between the teachings
> originally laid down and the later biblical emphasis introduced by
> Waite. This of course resulted in the introduction of Church concepts
> of morality and purity which are evident in almost everything that
> Waite wrote. His whole attitude became sex-negative as well as
> occult-negative. He made it almost a point of honour to eradicate any
> reference to every item in the Magical cut riculum laid down by Mathers
> and Westcott. Fortunately when he died in the late 1930's his Order
> died with him and so did his sex-negative attitudes, as well as his
> wretched pompous English -- characterized by a need to use Latin
> phrases where simple English would have been much better. Contrary to
> the common point of view he must have been a very ambitious person and
> this is made evident by the pompous titles he gave both to himself in
> the Rituals as well as to his attendant officers.
> 
> Poz!

Mislim da se iz ovog teksta jako dobro vidi kontekst iz kojeg Prica
prepisuje svoja "otkrivenja" i "iskustva", uglavnom sa zanemarivim
stupnjem bilo razumijevanja, bilo originalnosti. To su sve tvorevine iz
19. stoljeća, a sve priče o "tradiciji" su zapravo samo prijepis istih
takvih priča Blavatske, Bessant i Leadbeatera. Autor Pricinih koncepata
o učitelju s Tibeta je s jedne strane HPB, a s druge Castaneda. Dakle
umjesto da se netko nadjebava s njim, treba pročitati Blavatsku i ostale
teozofe i znat će o tome više nego Prica, koji je glupan koji je
pročitao sve skupa pet knjiga u životu i čak je i njih uspio pogrešno
shvatiti. Cijela ta "božanska mudrost" se da svesti na par rečenica, kad
makneš hrpu pompozne nadgradnje i sljeparija.

- --
http://www.danijel.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREKAAYFAkuWfSUACgkQU8G6/NHezOcckQCdFjar5FTgOF4T++4UBIwAu2YO
EhIAoMcb5S5Ctcb1ZFyEG/BnrzRHrlMY
=QU8b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----