Autor: Danijel Turina
Datum: 2011-10-23 18:46:25
Grupe: hr.soc.politika
Tema: Re: I prajdovci ru�ili Gadafija ?
Linija: 46
Message-ID: 201110231646.UTC.j81gd1$v55$2@tioat.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 10/23/2011 05:49 PM, Marin Božić wrote:
> Baš sam nedavno slušao audio-knjigu "The Next 100 Years" gdje autor
> George Friedman pokušava prognozirati razvoj događaja u 21 stoljeću na
> osnovu prinicipa geopolitike. Sad sam potražio PDF na webu i na
> stranici 46 piše:
> 
> "Having systematically achieved its strategic goals, the United States
> had the ultimate aim of preventing the emergence of any major power in
> Eurasia. The paradox, however, is as follows: the goal of these
> interventions was never to achieve something—whatever the political
> rhetoric might have said—but to prevent something. The United States
> wanted to prevent stability in areas where another power might emerge.
> Its goal was not to stabilize, but to destabilize. And that explains
> how the United States responded to the Islamic earthquake—it wanted to
> prevent a large, powerful Islamic state from emerging.
> 
> Rhetoric aside, the United States has no overriding interest in peace
> in Eurasia. The United States also has no interest in winning a war
> outright. As with Vietnam or Korea, the purpose of these conflicts is
> simply to block a power or destabilize the region, not to impose
> order. In due course, even outright American defeat is acceptable.
> However, the principle of using minimum force, when absolutely
> necessary, to maintain the Eurasian balance of power is—and will
> remain—the driving force of U.S. foreign policy throughout the twenty-
> first century. There will be numerous Kosovos and Iraqs in
> unanticipated places at unexpected times. U.S. actions will appear
> irrational, and would be if the primary goal is to stabilize the
> Balkans or the Middle East. But since the primary goal will more
> likely be simply to block or destabilize Serbia or al Qaeda, the
> interventions will be quite rational. They will never appear to really
> yield anything nearing a “solution,” and will always be done with
> insufficient force to be decisive."

To zvuči točno kao rezultat moje analize američkog djelovanja.

- -- 
http://www.danijel.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREKAAYFAk6kROEACgkQU8G6/NHezOeikQCfXBgTrlI9HjyaL7qQO8f06Y/j
QtUAn12wygQkIjBL/47s0TsU0jHikj8R
=YPYX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----