Autor: Danijel Turina Datum: 2011-10-23 18:46:25 Grupe: hr.soc.politika Tema: Re: I prajdovci ru�ili Gadafija ? Linija: 46 Message-ID: 201110231646.UTC.j81gd1$v55$2@tioat.net |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 10/23/2011 05:49 PM, Marin Božić wrote: > Baš sam nedavno slušao audio-knjigu "The Next 100 Years" gdje autor > George Friedman pokušava prognozirati razvoj događaja u 21 stoljeću na > osnovu prinicipa geopolitike. Sad sam potražio PDF na webu i na > stranici 46 piše: > > "Having systematically achieved its strategic goals, the United States > had the ultimate aim of preventing the emergence of any major power in > Eurasia. The paradox, however, is as follows: the goal of these > interventions was never to achieve something—whatever the political > rhetoric might have said—but to prevent something. The United States > wanted to prevent stability in areas where another power might emerge. > Its goal was not to stabilize, but to destabilize. And that explains > how the United States responded to the Islamic earthquake—it wanted to > prevent a large, powerful Islamic state from emerging. > > Rhetoric aside, the United States has no overriding interest in peace > in Eurasia. The United States also has no interest in winning a war > outright. As with Vietnam or Korea, the purpose of these conflicts is > simply to block a power or destabilize the region, not to impose > order. In due course, even outright American defeat is acceptable. > However, the principle of using minimum force, when absolutely > necessary, to maintain the Eurasian balance of power is—and will > remain—the driving force of U.S. foreign policy throughout the twenty- > first century. There will be numerous Kosovos and Iraqs in > unanticipated places at unexpected times. U.S. actions will appear > irrational, and would be if the primary goal is to stabilize the > Balkans or the Middle East. But since the primary goal will more > likely be simply to block or destabilize Serbia or al Qaeda, the > interventions will be quite rational. They will never appear to really > yield anything nearing a “solution,” and will always be done with > insufficient force to be decisive." To zvuči točno kao rezultat moje analize američkog djelovanja. - -- http://www.danijel.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREKAAYFAk6kROEACgkQU8G6/NHezOeikQCfXBgTrlI9HjyaL7qQO8f06Y/j QtUAn12wygQkIjBL/47s0TsU0jHikj8R =YPYX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |