On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 03:22:25 +0200, Valkyrian wrote:
> What I've found is that in brain size, intelligence, temperament, sexual 
> behavior, fertility, growth rate, life span, crime and family stability, 
> Orientals fall at one end of the spectrum, blacks fall at the other end 
> and whites fall in between. On average, Orientals are slower to mature, 
> less fertile and less sexually active, and have larger brains and higher 
> IQ scores. Blacks are at the opposite end in each of these areas. Whites 
> fall in the middle, often close to Orientals.
...
> The biological factors underlying race differences in sports have 
> consequences for educational achievement, crime and sexual behavior.
> In educational achievement and occupational success, Orientals average 
> slightly ahead of whites, who average substantially ahead of blacks. On 
> standardized IQ tests, hundreds of studies show this three-way pattern. 
> Most IQ tests have an average score of 100, with a "normal" range from 
> 85 to 115. Whites average from 100 to 103. Orientals in Asia and the 
> United States tend to have higher scores, about 106, even though IQ 
> tests were made for the European-American culture. Blacks in the United 
> States, the Caribbean, Britain and Africa average lower IQs - about 85. 
> The lowest average IQs are found for sub-Saharan Africans - from 70 to 
> 75.
> 
> The relation between brain size and intelligence has been shown by 
> dozens of studies, including state-of-the-art magnetic resonance 
> imaging. Orientals average 1 cubic inch more brain matter than whites, 
> and whites average a very large 5 cubic inches more than blacks. Since 
> one cubic inch of brain matter contains millions of brain cells and 
> hundreds of millions of nerve connections, brain-size differences help 
> to explain why the races differ in IQ.

Ovo je vrlo dobar članak i ono što je u njemu navedeno zvuči jako
vjerodostojno, i slaže se s mojim opažanjem koje glasi da su azijati
zapravo jači kandidat za mjesto superiorne rase nego bijelci. Štoviše,
upotrijebit ću taj članak protiv tebe u raspravi o bjelačkom porijeklu
starih civilizacija, i to na takav način da prvo ponovim tvoj stav da se
rasa ne mijenja preko noći i da se tu radi o trendovima koji traju desecima
tisuća godina. Onda ću dodatno ustvrditi kako se azijatska, a ne
indoeuropska rasa proširila na američki kontinent prije dvadeset tisuća
godina preko Beringovog prolaza, i protumačiti sve civilizacije od stare
kineske do Inka, Olmeka, Tolteka i Maja kao rezultat djelovanja superiorne
azijatske rase. Naime, ako IQ mjerenja, procjene veličine mozga i
civilizacijska dostignuća držimo razlogom procjene crnačke rase kao
inferiorne bjelačkoj, onda se moramo tog kriterija držati i kad
zaključujemo da je azijatska rasa superiorna bjelačkoj, iako neznatno. 

Zbog ovako kvalitetnog dokaza nemam potrebe kopati po povijesnim i
pretpovijesnim artefaktima poput veličine kamenja u pojedinim piramidama,
pa ću raspravu iz one druge poruke reducirati na ovu.

> What are the implications of this research? One is that we should stop 
> blaming white racism for all society's problems. If blacks are good at 
> certain sports and Orientals do well in schools, it cannot be because 
> each group is trying to "overcome the prejudice of white society," 
> because each group shows the same pattern of strengths and weaknesses in 
> their countries of origin.

Odlično uočeno. 

-- 
http://www.danijel.org/